(I'm happily married to my first wife, so I have only the experience of others to draw on.)
Word to the wise, don't let her hear you calling her your first wife!
Listen to him. If not, you might as well call her your ex-wife!
Simple solution here is to have separate backup files of separate data. How hard is it to set the routine to make a backup of "robs documents" and another of "debs documents"?
If my wife knew about Deb that would make the divorce inevitable and immediate.
Evidently I am in the
OK, I'll bite.
1. Your ambulance is not dispatched by the Federal government. There is a big difference between your local sheriff knowing where you cell phone is to dispatch fire/police/medical services than three letter government agencies monitoring your whereabouts.
2. Having the ability to pinpoint any given cell phone when requested by the user while not actively monitoring movement or storing history is significantly different than knowing your location and movement with indefinite history and record keeping.
It is OK if you are willing to accept intrusion and control in the name of safety. However, there is no reason to have such a negative reaction to those that prefer to hold our government overlords at arms length and within the reins of the Constitution.
Please. Cite one real example. Go on.
1) Your post.
2) Original post. I know, on one side we've got loads of data, models, research... On the other side, denial.
"hands over your ears". Talk about projection.
Indeed.
I know, on one side we've got loads of data, models, research... On the other side, denial.
Yes, all this data that proves the point beyond all doubt. But when questioned, there is no debate of scientific merit or discussion of flaws, real or perceived, in the data. There is labeling the counter opinion "deniers" while firmly placing your hands over your ears.
Kind of like back in the day where conventional wisdom said the earth was flat and "deniers" were killed rather than mocked.
Science that cannot tolerate being questioned is not science.
How about plain removing the scanners. That'd be some Passenger advocacy right there.
That does nothing to get the public comfortable with a police state. Passenger advocacy only matters when this is about the passengers, which security theater is most certainly not.
I always ask the groper, "how do you feel about your mother being treated this way"
Fantastic. I'm using this the next time I fly.
Wanna buy a duck?