Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:For me it's the reverse (Score 1) 165 165

With affordable/budget computers soon to be secure boot locked to windows 10+ ONLY(no more linux etc).

Many Linux distributions are totally fine booting on a computer with activated secure boot, using a boot loader that was signed by Microsoft.

Do you have any source for your claim that that will not work anymore? Otherwise I call FUD.

Comment: Re:How is this illegal? (Score 2) 97 97

Still don't see the harm if Apple and the publishers try to set prices. You. An either deal with Apple or not. It's up to the publishers if they want to make that deal.

It would help if you read up on this case...

Apple and the publishers did not only fix the prices you pay at Apples shop, but they also forced all other ebook retailers to follow the agency model that Apple wanted and pay at least what Apple payed to the publishers.

So this collusion harmed all retailers, and thus all consumers because it removed a lot of choice.

Comment: Re:E-book prices (Score 1) 97 97

Why should digital sale not use the wholesale model?

I do not want the publishers to dictate the price, because they are removed from the customer and thus don't think of the customer when setting prices.

The publishers are the ones that first sell eBooks for the price of the hardcover paper book and only go down with the price when the paperback is released.
It doesn't make sense that the same eBook suddenly should be worth only a third of what I would have had to pay earlier.
Publishers don't understand the digital business and would only be trying to prop up the classic paper business that they are used to.

Comment: Re:e-book prices HAVE been too high. (Score 1) 97 97

Strangely enough, on or Google Play for many books I can find 2 versions for different prices. Usually from different publishers.

Of course, it could be that this is only because I'm living in Europe and there is some overlap in publishing rights. But still.

Comment: Re:I think Apple's glory days are over (Score 1) 304 304

Apple does not force you to use iTunes unless you have an iDevice, and increasingly, even that is not true.

Can I buy music from the iTunes store without installing the iTunes software?
That's not a rhetorical question: I would like to buy something that is only available there, but there is no Linux version of iTunes.

Comment: Re:Easy (Score 1) 58 58

It's always sucking, but there needs to be something there for it to suck for it to suck something.

But... that doesn't make sense.
Either it's always sucking, then it is also sucking when there is nothing to be sucked in.
Or it is only sucking when there is something to be sucked in, then it isn't always sucking.

I wish we had somebody who could analyze this further. Somebody who specializes in black holes and their suckiness. Maybe in astronomic bodies in general. We could call those specialists 'astronomers'.

Comment: Re:Bullshit (Score 2) 271 271

Well, how about you tell your colleagues that it is stupid to piss of one of your first customers (that guy has been using YouTube for 10 years!) with no good reason.
He was there first, he has every right to use the name, and there are certainly more than one company by the name of 'Lush'.
Creating the precedent opens a can of worms.

And: Even if we don't know everything. Saying that they can not undo a change they did is definitely bullshit. They might not want to, but if they could change it in one direction they can certainly change it in the opposite direction.

Comment: Re:Makes sense (Score 5, Insightful) 271 271

You think there is only one company by the name of "Lush" in the whole wide world? Or even in America?
Who decides which company gets this nice short URL and which doesn't?

This is usually solved on the first come first served basis, and Google should to the same.
And since this guy was the first and has the right to us his name (he didn't go for "lushcosmetics" nor "whitehousegov") he should keep it.

This decision by Google is stupid and sets a bad precedent.
Not counting the fact that their argument that this can not be reversed is certainly an outright lie.

Comment: Re:Less suspect than the others (Score 1) 78 78

Insufficiently protecting the data of their users (iCloud).
Collecting wifi data without consent.
Just two examples that come to mind immediately.

Google and Apple are pretty much the same.
But Apple pretends not to be like Google way to much, when is clear they do the same stuff.

Comment: Re:Less suspect than the others (Score 4, Insightful) 78 78

Apple does not only sell hardware but also digital goods and ads. And to target said goods and ads they need what? A good profile of the user.

Apple does pretty much the same Google does. But Tim Cook dares to go on stage and pretend they don't. That makes him a liar in my book.

Over the years there were enough cases where we could see that apple does in fact collect data from their users without telling them (and without protecting said data properly).
Apple is neither better or worse than Google in that respect.

And neither of them is very interested in giving the information about their users to third parties. Their advantage in the ad/targeting business is that THEY have the profile of their users and the third parties do not.

Comment: Re:Wow?! (Score 1) 401 401

No. The ruling expressively said that it only applies to this specific case.

And the ruling does NOT say that you have to moderate every post. Only that if you have an option for users to report offensive content and if you are known to moderate comments on your own (as this website did) then you can be expected to do it fast.

Comment: Re:15 years in the embassy (Score 1) 262 262

BS. Given the attention that this whole situation has been given, they can not just disappear Assange. Not anymore.

If the British police put him in a plane and the Swedish police doesn't receive him, that would be a real problem for Sweden.

Also, they can not extradite him anymore silently, but if the US wants him they have to officially ask Sweden and Sweden has to go trough the whole legal process.
The situation is way to public for Sweden to risk being seen cutting corners.

Comment: Re:15 years in the embassy (Score 1) 262 262

This case is kind of returning to medieval practice of keeping people in dungeons.

Nobody keeps Assange in some dungeon.
He was free on bail awaiting trial (or extradition), he could have lived in some spacey condo or whatnot.

But he decided, on his own himself, to run and go to the embassy. (Thereby forfeiting the money of the sponsor who posted bail. Real classy move.)

And even there he is free to leave 'the dungeon' at any time.
It is his decision to stay there.

You implying that the UK government is to blame is ignoring the facts.

Comment: Re:Read he article (Score 1) 262 262

but in a one-night stand, consent should be sought each time.

This is pretty much the view of a prostitute who's charging for each ejaculation.

In real life, consent is rarely explicitly given. When I'm caressing a women, just before penetration I do not ask if I can. As long as she doesn't say "no", I infer she accepts.

Sure, consent is rarely explicitly given. But the other person needs to be in a position to make a decision. They need to be able to voice their objection, if they so desire. Somebody who sleeps can neither consent nor object.

Or let me put it differently: Consent needs to be given explicitly (using words or actions) or implicitly (by being able to object, but not doing so).
But lack of consent because the other person can not make any decision means you're entering rape territory.

In the situation described here the woman awoke before/during sex and did not seem to have voiced any complaint. That fact saves Assange from going to trial for rape: She was in a position to voice complaint and seemingly didn't.

Yes, I know misandrists... I mean feminists, are trying to get all the power they can against men. S

Ugh. What cave did you come out of?

The rule on staying alive as a forecaster is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once. -- Jane Bryant Quinn