You tell me.
December 8: Iran responsible for 1998 U.S. embassy bombings
December 22: Judge: Iran, Taliban, al Qaeda liable for 9/11

I can't tell if they have decided yet, but I wouldn't rule out that this is the preparation of a narrative.

Boston Dynamics' PETMAN could do its own balancing two years ago.

The problem is that it is not "only supposed to be a document display". Someone gave a pretty good summary on Reddit about a month ago. The conclusion is that Adobe Reader is most likely overkill for 90% of the users, and you should stick to something like SumatraPDF or Foxit.

Aren't desktop firewalls useful in cases where attackers use malicious PDFs/Office documents/browser exploits to run reverse shells? If the exploit tries to connect to evilhost.com:443, how can a server firewall know that the connection is not a legitimate HTTPS connection?

As far as I understand, desktop firewalls would block attempts like these, as long as the connection isn't initiated by a whitelisted program. Of course the exploit payload could include methods to whitelist itself, but I assume there is no one single method to do this, so the payload would have to include custom methods for each of the personal firewall vendors.

Disclaimer: I have no experience with personal firewalls, and if I'm talking out of my ass, please correct me.

The Youtube video was posted January 12, 2008 :\

I think Sharepoint can do exactly what you are looking for. I haven't seen the "usable interface", though, as the installations I've tried has been quite messy web interfaces, but I'm sure it can be customized to no end.

CNN Live (a href="http://edition.cnn.com/live/">http://cnn.com/live/ works fine for me in Ubuntu, but thanks.