Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Get your neighbours to change. (Score 1) 451

by midnighttoadstool (#26527667) Attached to: How Best To Deal With WiFi Interference?

I can't answer all your questions, and it seems no one else has either.

However you already know that APs cooperate when on the same channel, so the best thing you can do is get your neighbours to change to non-overlapping channels. I have done this by visiting my neighbours, explaining the problem and helping them to change channel. Result: reliable connection. You might prefer to get the concierge to advertise good wifi practice.

If you end up configuring all your neighbours then you get a chance to distribute signals intelligently: ie, reserve two channels for big downloaders, and the other reserved to ordinary users (even a single channel is more than enough for 20 people browsing the web).

Non-standard wifi and N: generally speaking it is best for these devices to be configured for g or b and disable the fancy feature which stomps on signals and acts like interference. They will do better not just you. Disable anything out of the ordinary.

Comment: ...and yet prior to the 1920s... (Score 1) 203

by midnighttoadstool (#26512145) Attached to: One In 100 Carry Mutation For Heart Disease
Prior to the 1920s heart disease as we know it now was almost unknown. Find a graph of its rise and it begins in the early 20th century, peaking in the 50s.

As President Rossevelt's doctor is quoted as saying, words to the effect of "A physician could expect to see one or two cases in a whole career."

..and in 50 years its not animal fat that has had a causal link demonstrated, but vegetable oils and hydrogenated byproducts (margarine etc).

Genetics is just another red-herring.

Comment: Subsidy (Score 1) 570

by midnighttoadstool (#26249031) Attached to: What Carriers Don't Want You To Know About Texting

The carriers have to make money: texts are used to subsidise other services. If they aren't allowed to charge such a high fee then voice goes up. There are plenty in the UK who barely use voice, so the carriers must find ways of making money from them.

Unless one accepts a general principle against subsidy (which infact I personally do as it obscures, causes distortions and also bubbles) then this isn't an issue. For government to interfere, which is effectively what this article logically ends at, would be absurd since governments are subsidy addicts.

Comment: Re:Good (Score 1) 326

by midnighttoadstool (#26235043) Attached to: Technocrat.net Shut Down
Feelings, religion? Consider that you might be presuming upon a Vulcan.

In anycase "it's just a philosophy" is an illogical response. Marxism could be called 'just a philosophy', but equally with Stallman's position it causes human misery and removes human satisfactions by contradicting your nature.

I merely point this matters out for your information, since I am not affected by them in anyway, so that you may live long and prosper.

Microsoft

+ - Microsoft owns up to Xbox Live pretexting

Submitted by
jcatcw
jcatcw writes "Reports of account theft on Xbox Live have been making the rounds of its member forums since at least December. Microsoft yesterday finally admitted that the service's support staff is at fault — victims of "pretexting." But Microsoft responded only after noted security researcher — Kevin Finisterre of "Month of Apple Bugs" fame — last week went public about how his account was hijacked."
PlayStation (Games)

+ - PS3 Folding like crazy

Submitted by hlimethe3rd
hlimethe3rd (879459) writes "We've seen numerous articles about the Playstation 3 being a total flop as a gaming machine. But now, the machine is tearing through Folding@Home. It already accounts for almost 75% of the FLOPS for the whole project . Much in the same way as the GPU client produced amazing results, the PS3's cell architecture is ideally suited for Folding calculations. So don't buy one as a gaming console, buy one to save your grandmother."
Software

+ - New sort, quicker than QuickSort

Submitted by
ThomasCR
ThomasCR writes "AI goes unexpected directions. Here, in a collaboration of humans and a program, a new sorting algorithm has been developed. Considerably faster than the well known QuickSort, for which it has been long thought, that it is the fastest way to order an array of integers or floating point numbers. Apparently not, according to this site: http://critticall.com/underconstruction.html Is something like that possible at all?"

If you do something right once, someone will ask you to do it again.

Working...