Your argument: the following is a "good test":
Actually, I said it was a test, but not a "good test". Go back and read it.
Also, I said 20 years does not a decadal trend make. (It doesn't.)
Also, I said we'd swing back to the last 20 years... and do the regression ourselves together. The reason for this is that there is some theory we'd have to agree to first..
You've made an argument. I made an objection. You've refused to answer.
One thing at a time. Got to stop *your* gish galloping. If you did this, then in theory we could cover everything.
If, and only if, you reply in a mature fashion, we can continue this discussion.