meanwhile, existing towns are running out of water.
For the umpteenth time: desalination is a solved problem. There is no reason — other than incompetence of irrational fears of nuclear power — for any coastal city to lack water in the 21st century.
Except They are the Cavalry — according to their own page — are focusing on Cyber Safety, not privacy.
And our privacy — as far as cars are concerned anyway — has been shot for over a century already, when New York (always the Illiberal) mandated license plates in 1901.
They could not think, of course, that some day automatic license-plate readers will be archiving our driving histories. But the move — targeting "the rich", of course — was just as invasive even back then, as mandating that people carry identification at all times would be. And not just carry, but keep it visible from distance too...
Cars' new electronics may make it easier for the State to track us, but it has not been that hard before...
Why would you even want to do that?
Because I want more fellow human beings to exist. More artists, more scientists, more outright geniuses. Sure, more thieves too, but criminals affect the same share of population, whereas a single brilliant scientist may invent FTL travel or cure cancer for all...
But my wants are a moot point — the population will rise whether or not I (or you) want it, according to TFA.
What do you think filters out all of the crap we're putting into it?
Why do you hate humanity?
This individual and a Mr. Fusion, perhaps.
Mr. Fission — Mr. Fusion's older brother — would do just fine, thank you very much.
Not such a bright idea to plan on rearranging the world
I'm not planning on anything. I'm not even talking about rearranging the world — only the regions, Man may decide to populate when his technology allows.
The "rearranging" will not be any worse — nor seem any more "Star-Trekian" — than damming rivers or dredging waterways.
And you forgot all about 'ol Murphy.
He's always been with us, but we've grown in numbers anyway and are hardly starving today.
Yes but that food is already being grown
What the fook are you talking about? Israelis grow food in their own desert. The same methods can be used in Sahara and all other "hot" deserts — including the giant Sinai peninsula, which remains bare and barren since its return to Egypt.
It is possible and we know how to do it. We aren't doing it, but we can. And, should a compelling need arise, we will.
(and the water being overexploited)
There is no such thing.
I'm not sure that can be done cost effectively just yet.
It does not need to be done today. By 2100 we will be able to.
Though given that much of the non-populated near arctic is tundra on top of granite I am not sure how feasible that really is.
And we can — with nuclear or fusion reactors...
Quantity of people is not a problem — not now, not in 2100. Quality, on the other hand, has always been a problem...
Arable land, potable water, things like that.
Land is plentiful, water is, indeed, needed to make it arable, but desalination is a solved problem — you just need electricity. And we can provide that even today in abundance with fission (nuclear plants) and will certainly be able to have it even better in the future with fusion.
It starts to sound a lot like living off-Earth at that point, no?
All of the problems you listed are several orders of (decimal) magnitude worse on other bodies of the Solar System. And the problem of inter-star travel has not been solved yet even in theory — nor even is it obvious, the solution will ever be found.
We will, probably, colonize Mars some day, but the South Pole is much more comfortable for humans than any spot of the Red Planet. And the ping-times are much shorter...
Midwestern states had higher combined populations than the Northwestern states.
You truly are a blithering nincompoop, aren't you? Can't tell the difference between population and population density
Preferably for people who want to turn America's farmland into some sprawling metropolis...
You blithering idiot! A blubbering fool! A nincompoop! Nobody is talking about your precious farmland (which produces far too much stuff anyway, but that's a separate story).
Vast areas of Earth remain unpopulated. In no particular order:
- American Midwest
- Most of Canada
- Australia's Outback
- Sahara and other hot deserts
- Antarctica — a whopping continent
Sure, some of the above would require some work to make comfortable, but it can be done even with today's technology — by 2100 even an individual (or a family) would convert surroundings to their tastes. And it would certainly be easier, than moving an appreciable quantity of people off-Earth...
dignity has nothing to do with this.
Dignity is the only thing, that suffers, when a cop violates an innocent man's privacy. If dignity has nothing to do with it, than "innocent man going to prison" does not either — yet you brought up the latter yourself earlier...
this contract cannot be violated
The contract was in no more danger before the change in Apple's attitude, really, than it is now — a court order was still required for Apple to act.
The legal theories have not changed — only the practical hurdles the law enforcement has to deal with (having to compel the individual phone-owner, rather than Apple).
Many of Robert Heinlein works were truly Science Fiction. His characters' travels around the Solar System, for example, are described enumerating the challenges and details such travel are likely to have in real life. He also has several descriptions of human life outside of Earth — on Ganymede, on Mars, and on the Moon. None of the descriptions were patently unscientific, when they were written (knowing what we do now, he would not have described life on Venus as he did, of course).
He wrote many of such books for children (and published in children publications) or about children — so you can read them with/to your kids. The bonus is, such reading would not even seem like work — you are likely to truly enjoy it...
it's better for ten guilty men to go free than one innocent man to go to prison
I said nothing about "going to prison" — an overzealous pig would find nothing incriminating on my phone. It is not that "I have nothing to hide" — I do. But I have no evidence of crimes on my phone either. My dignity will suffer, sure, but I will not be imprisoned.
When the proverbial relation you quoted changes to "10 guilty men to go free than 1000 innocent men's dignity to be violated", the answer becomes less obvious...