Or you just use the "super key" instead of alt-f2 and get your icons and partial name search features back. You also don't have to stretch your fingers that far.
Been running Gnome 3 for the past year or so now and I quite like it, but I agree with you on alt-tab issue. I recommend the extention alternatetab which fixes that to work more simple and sane. Before installing alternatetab I avoided alt-tab all together and just used the super-key to get to the activities screen and switch window.
The feature I miss the most now is the ability to rearrange workspaces. Quite often I find my self constantly switching between say workspace 1 and 4, with some other crap on workspace 2 and 3. Then I would like to drag and drop workspace 4 so it becomes the new workspace 2.
I can't decide if this is bad grammar or great philosophical humor.
You're not fooling anyone Sarah Palin
In particle physics I believe the term "massive particle" is used to denote any particle with mass. Makes for a nice contrast to a massless particle. See for instance the wikipedia entry or the paper in question on arXiv.
If I were to claim "My state will teach Newtonian theory of gravity is not fact" would you have issues with it? How about Einstein's theory of gravity? I would be correct in teaching them that those two theories were/are not factual, and showing where the gaps are. This is how we make progress in science and improve theories.
It is important to understand that all we have are observations (with noise) and we make theories/models to explain them in order to predict future behavior. Newton's mechanics worked great for the observations available at that time, while relativity theory is needed under other circumstances such that when matter travel at speeds close to the speed of light. Getting students to understand this and to realize that there are likely cases when even Einstein's theories do not explain observations is of course very valuable. However, this does not mean that any theory of mechanics is equally useful/plausible. We have for instance no reason to look back to Aristotle or some other ancient theory as an alternative as they do not offer any predictability.
Would teaching where these theories seem to fail mean that "I refuse to teach about gravity" and all of my students are idiots because I taught them to question what someone else want's them taught as "fact" (this matches the straw man TFA erects and you seem to believe)?
I'm not sure what article you are referring to but I don't see anyone claiming "not teach their children what is accepted in the scientific community". I read "argued against teaching natural selection as fact, " and "teach them the controversy".
Evolution and Natural selection surely have some gaps, which is why there is still some controversy. You may not like the other side, so choose to ignore the gaps which makes you biased. Just like the other side is biased, but of course that is difficult to come to grips with our own shortcomings.
Of course there are controversies within the fine details in the field of biology as in any research field, but they are just not the controversies Sen. Mike Fair has in mind. The term "teach the controversy" is used to propose that intelligent design/creationism are valuable alternative ideas to natural selection (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teach_the_controversy). There is simply no such controversy among scientist, the people who believe in creationism do so primarily on religious grounds. Here's an interesting article explaining some actual controversies in evolution: http://arstechnica.com/science.... One among them apparently being the relationship between the three main cell types Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes and how they exactly evolved in the beginning.
A big part of science used to be not accepting what someone gives you and following the scientific methods. Teaching people to question what they are told surely has benefits. Are you so biased that questions are only valid about someone else' belief?
I agree that it would be great to teach high school students some theory of science and give them the tools to separate good science from bad science and pseudo science such as astrology, creationism and "young earth theories". I have a hard time believing this is what the senator in SC is proposing though.
One simple mechanic that some Ouya games use is that you can only play for a limited time every day, say 10-20 minutes. That works very well for puzzle games or games like Counter Strike. A short story based game where someone might simply play through the story in small pieces, 10 minutes a day, could maybe be limited by a total ever play time. So from the first time you install it you can only play x minutes (enough to get through max a 1/4 of the game or so)
Just to give a second oppinion I can say that I really enjoy my Ouya that I bought in August. I payed $149 (one extra controller) and honestly almost felt it was repaid after the first weekend of playing games and having a blast with my girlfriend (Hidden in plain sight, Bomb Squad, Suction co-op). And now that I've discovered XBMC and spend countless hours playing Nimble Quest and Knightmare Tower the cost is completely written off.
I really like the simpleness of most Ouya games. I just don't have the time to get into some long complicated game any more, so most new AAA titles don't attract me. But my previous console was a Super Nintendo, so my reference frame might be different from many hard-core gamers
I have experienced some un-responsiveness with the controllers which went away after a reboot, but none of the other problems you describe. Maybe many of the issues that the Kickstarter supporters experienced in the beginning has been fixed providing me with a generally more positive experience. Also I just feel completely amazed at the power you can pack in such small item and for such a small cost. The same goes for the games, I mean, most of them are cheaper than my lunch!
So, thank you very much for supporting the Ouya on Kickstarter, allowing people like me to enjoy it. I'm sorry it didn't live up to your expectations. For me it really doesn't matter if the Ouya is "doomed" or not, I'm enjoying mine plenty anyway.
Can't decide whatever to post as AC or aliquis. Score mod points and karma or forever be seen as a drug lord by the NSA.
The things you do for karma.
Reading the comments on that G+ link one quickly learns that M-66 are apparently common firecrackers and that she posted the picture on July 4, a day I believe many associate with fireworks and firecrackers. I'm not saying your post is factually incorrect, a woman did indeed seem to post a picture of something explosive on Facebook. But to me that rather supports the absurdity that I believe the original article wants to point out. If you collect everything someone (or even worse a whole family collectively) writes or reads online and filter for a broad spectrum of keywords you can make up a juicy story on just about anyone.
At first I agreed with you and thought the GP wasn't aware of the concept of chaos (small errors in input give large errors in output). However, that's not what he wrote. He correctly pointed out that the rounding error is much smaller than the error from the initial measurement. Logically it should be the dominant error that first leads to chaotic behavior. The problem then seems to be over-belief in the forecast due to not accounting correctly for the measurement error. Long before any rounding errors start to play a role one should have stopped the simulation as it didn't predict anything useful anyway.
But as far as I can understand there was no patent of design patent involved, at least I can't find anything on patents.google.com for that guy. There was only the CC-NC copyright clause of the drawing.
I'm very curious as to what your point was regarding this. Continuing to pay without using the service is of course the wet dream of any subscription based business, including Spotify, Netflix and also your gym. Could you elaborate a little bit on why you think the study is flawed? Are you saying people are paying for Spotify but are still pirating music, but yet music piracy goes down for some other reason?
Which is exactly why it was the perfect quote for this occation! Same words, even same meaning, yet suddenly almost opposite meaning. Loved it.
Replying to myself with some more information in lack of being able to edit Slashdot posts. Apparently it was a conscious decision to go with the fox instead of a panda as the panda "didn't quite conjure up the right imagery". So there you have it.