Well, being from Harvard also, I disagree.
I am willing to bet that the average analytical skill and critical thinking ability of a Harvard freshman would far exceed that of most Slashdotters.
If you're just going by features, then there have been many other products out there that have been much better than the Apple counterpart.
From the iPod to Macs, Apple rarely tries to win on features and specs. Their products are often good enough, but not great.
Yes, I am aware of them, and they have their own brand of cliches.
I just enjoy the perspective that Slashdot readers provide because it is insightful yet different enough from the hackneyed responses I see elsewhere.
And besides, we both value different things from the insights, because I enjoy the insights here for the unique perspective rather than the value. I am less interested in right vs. wrong and more interested in new ways to look at an old problem, and new factors and interesting tidbits to consider.
I come to Slashdot for a certain type of view point, and sometimes, I am indeed interested in what Slashdotters have to say on topics of political and economic interest.
In that sense, I am often delighted when Slashdot carries such articles because it gives me an opportunity to understand a particular issue in a new light.
The signal to noise ratio here is significantly better than, say, CNN (i.e., imagine siphoning through thousands of comments on R vs. D debates). In contrast, I find that there is more rational discussion, and new insights here on Slashdot than elsewhere. Obviously, YMMV.
Also, this is not tangible personal property. It is a bunch of electrons.
Are you serious? Are you that much of an idiot?
There is a reason there is *intellectual* property law.
Property laws exist immaterial of what form the property takes -- trademarks and patents are all nothing more than ideas in our heads put to paper, and they are protected for a reason.
I can see this reasoning on another site, but I'd think the readers of Slashdot would have an understanding of what digital property entails.
I would characterize those areas as IT and software engineering, and not necessarily Computer Science.
I would perhaps state that some areas of computing (e.g., systems design, architecture) are better grouped under software engineering, given their nature.
I almost feel that there needs a distinction between software engineering and computer science. To paraphrase David Parnas, computer science studies the properties of computation in general while software engineering is the design of specific computations to achieve practical goals.
Muddling the two disciplines causes heartache because you have people who are great at designing software, but cannot grok advanced math; and on the other hand, you potentially limit your solutions to what's within the realm of current applicability, without exploring other possibilities (e..g, reinventing new algorithms for quantum computation).
I would add a nuance to your point and state that real world experience matters in IT, but not in CS.
Computer Science is more about algorithms, systems architecture, and a lot of math. I did very little programming when I did CS in grad school and a whole lot of pretty awesome math (computational complexity, graphics, optimizations etc). Not sure about undergrad, since I did ECE, which, once again, was a whole lot of math (DSP, control systems, engineering electromagnetics, circuit theory, VLSI etc).
In any event, real-world relevance is more important to IT than it is to CS. I would say that it is however somewhat important in engineering, which, once again, is a professional degree.
B-schools often hire people who are not in academia per se, but have rich real world experience in solving business problems.
For instance, you will often find senior partners from top consulting firms teaching classes, because they bring to bear not just academic knowledge but also practical experience.
People who do their MBA are not there to just learn the latest and greatest management technique from academia -- they also seek to apply that to the real world.
And this is not just true for MBAs -- it is also true for law schools, medical schools, and many other professional degrees. You'll find former judges and lawyers teaching classes, and you'll find doctors and surgeons with real world experience tempering your academic knowledge with their real world experience.
Public policy is another area where you former civil servants often teaching classes.
As an Indian American, while I agree with the spirit of your comment, please remember that we are just as badly affected by the H1B visas as any other Americans.
Unfortunately, we are all cast in the same light, our background, academic qualifications, or experience notwithstanding.
...and someone else will take his place.
It's your father's microkernel. A more elegant weapon for a more civilized age.
That's not what your mom said.
Yes, because anyone who cannot afford to pay for a baby sitter should forego ever eating out or watching a movie.
And the reason you find more babies out is for a few reasons:
1. Families are smaller and there is less of grandma and grandpa living 'round the block. As such, you are left with no family help.
2. Economic realities make childcare extreme expensive, even in double income families.
3. Single parents are also a lot more common, and the single parent already has someone taking care of the kid during the day. They can't magically "leave" the kid behind for everything that they do, just because other assholes in public find them to be an inconvenience.
If I can't get a sitter, I'll do my best to calm my baby when I'm out in public. If you don't like it, you can bugger off.
You know, I cannot understand the recent cultural backlash against babies.
Yes, babies cry. They cry at night, they cry in restaurants, and they cry on airplanes. They cry when they are hungry, when they are tired, when they're pooping, and when they need a diaper change. And often, they cry for apparently no reason at all.
As a father of a four month old, I can tell you that we parents aren't exactly pleased to hear our babies cry, either. We don't want our kids to be in pain, and we want them to be happy. We are acutely conscious of bothering others, and we feel helpless about the whole thing.
But you know what's worse? Assholes who cannot stop complaining about crying babies. Guess what? It's how human beings are. You cried too. So did every human being who's ever lived.
So, get over it. Babies cry. Live with it. If you don't like it, find a place without any humans who procreate. And show some empathy, for crying out loud.
Take your Prozac and walk away slowly from the keyboard...