Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Polls on the front page of Slashdot? Is the world coming to an end?! Nope; read more about it. ×

Comment: Re:Moving parts are the main problem (Score 1) 655

by mdwebster (#27526201) Attached to: How Do I Provide a Workstation To Last 15 Years?

First spec sheet I looked up from STMicro stated 1 million write cycles and 40 year retention. Second one from Microchip says a million as well. Third one from Atmel says a million cycles + 100 years retention.

But it's worth thinking about for a while to come up with a flash solution since even adding a $.10 IC adds up over millions of drives.

Comment: Re:Moving parts are the main problem (Score 2, Interesting) 655

by mdwebster (#27470337) Attached to: How Do I Provide a Workstation To Last 15 Years?

It's Mean Time Between Failure. Your example gives it as a hard number that none of the drives will survive past. There will be a statistical spread, but not like you describe it.

The actual spread depends on the shape of the failure distribution which isn't normally given. In a lot of cases, it's a Weibull curve which front-loads the failures and has a long tail. Even then though, you don't expect more than 60 to 70% of drives to have failed by the MTBF point.

"To take a significant step forward, you must make a series of finite improvements." -- Donald J. Atwood, General Motors

Working...