Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: The random numbers are to mitigate kernel exploits (Score 2) 143

by mbessey (#46484345) Attached to: Weak Apple PRNG Threatens iOS Exploit Mitigations

Why does the boot process require random numbers, anyway?

They mention this in the article - one way to make a kernel harder to write an exploit for is to randomize the layout of memory somewhat, so system libraries, kernel tables, and the like are located in different places. Obviously if the "random" numbers are predictable, this makes those mitigation techniques less-useful.

Comment: About those margins... (Score 1) 348

by mbessey (#44867075) Attached to: Did Apple Make a Mistake By Releasing Two New iPhones?

But it's far more questionable whether he would welcome the iPhone 5C—almost certainly a low-margin device, despite its current-generation components and plastic body—taking a bite out of the more expensive, and presumably higher-margin iPhone 5S

Seriously? This guys thinks the margins on the iPhone 5c are *lower* than the 5s? In that case, why is everybody else complaining about how expensive the 5c is, and saying it should have been released at a $300 price point? If you believe that the 5c could be made & sold at $300 (and I do), then since it sells at $550, Apple *must* be making something like 40% margins on them. The 5s is $100 more, but I bet it's considerably more-expensive to make.

Comment: Outsourcing, all around (Score 2) 135

by mbessey (#39356529) Attached to: Study Confirms the Government Produces the Buggiest Software

It's likely that the percentage of outsourced projects tracks the prevalence of security problems. Certainly, the government has a very high level of outsourced vs in-house development. I think that financial institutions also tend to largely outsource (especially customer-facing) development.


+ - 10-Year Old Girl Accidentally Discovers New Explosive Molecule, Co-Authors Paper-> 1

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Clara might just be a normal fifth grade student, but she just got her name into a paper, which she co-authored with Robert Zoellner. It all started in science class when Kenneth Boehr, her science teacher, brought out the ball-and-stick model and allowed the students to just play around. The ball-and-stick models are used to visualize simple molecules and often proves quite instrumental in explaining the angles and lengths of bonds right."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Want to bet? (Score 1) 368

by mbessey (#38959121) Attached to: Apple Intern Spent 12 Weeks Porting Mac OS X To ARM

I'd be willing to put a reasonable amount of money at risk predicting that Apple will eventually ship something that's not an iPhone or iPad, which runs the full version of Mac OS X on the ARM architecture. Given how smooth (relatively speaking) the PPC-to-Intel transition went, it'd be a minor speed bump for most developers, not a major disaster. If you're already supporting PPC and Intel, then ARM is just a testing burden - you already need to code for big- and little-endian architectures, for example.

Given the Mac App Store, there's a lot less in the way of friction to just recompile something and put it out there, as opposed to trying to get boxes on retail shelves. Yes, third-party developers will complain, and so will users if they can't get whatever apps they depend on right away. Given that Macs already come with all the basics (email, web, music/video playback), probably 75% of typical users wouldn't even need to buy anything for an ARM Macbook Air to get plenty of use out of it.

Comment: More like 6+, depending on what you count... (Score 3, Informative) 368

by mbessey (#38958995) Attached to: Apple Intern Spent 12 Weeks Porting Mac OS X To ARM

If you're willing to include software that was developed, but not released, there are:
    m68k (original NeXT hardware)
    i386 (NEXTSTEP for Intel processors)
    Motorola m88k (NeXT RISC Workstation - never released, but a working copy was at Apple when I worked there)
    PowerPC (Mac OS X Server 1.0, later developed into Mac OS X)

Significant bits of NeXT software were also ported to Intel i860 and DEC Alpha, but not enough of the OS to actually qualify as a "NEXTSTEP port"

Comment: Enyo 2.0 is designed to be cross-platform (Score 1) 137

by mbessey (#38833153) Attached to: HP To Open Source WebOS

I'm not sure I'm understanding the question, here. Do you mean could it be included with Android? Absolutely - the license allows that, though I'm not sure what advantage shipping a version of Enyo with an Android distribution would be. It'd likely be out of date fairly rapidly.

If your question was more along the lines of "will Enyo apps run on Android", then the answer is it depends a bit on what version of Android - there are some significant bugs with some Android browsers That said, the intent is for Enyo 2.0 to be compatible with as many web browsers as possible.

Comment: Re:Wow, have you ever read a book? (Score 1) 175

by mbessey (#38824167) Attached to: Star Wars Uncut Project Complete

Yeah, the "adult is the murderer of the child' metaphor is fairly common in literature, but it's not something people use in everyday conversation, which is what the dialog in a movie supposedly represents. Like I said, even if Obi-wan is just trying to skirt around the truth, it really doesn't reflect well on him, or on the Jedi in general. Yes "your father is a mass-murderer who turned to the dark side of the force and now calls himself Darth Vader" wouldn't be a nice thing to hear, but keeping Luke's parentage a secret from him is leaving him open to be pretty badly blindsided in the future.

The twin sister bit is also easily explained, Leia shows no signs of being a Jedi, Luke does. It isn't until the expanded universe that sorce sensitivity in Leia is ever mentioned let alone developed as her being nearly as powerful.

Not that it's particularly relevant, but that's simply not correct. Here's what the ghost of Obi-wan has to say about Leia in Episode VI, after Luke figures out that she's his sister:

She hasn't been trained in the ways of the
Jedi the way you have, Luke ... but the Force
is strong with her, as it is with all of your

Anyway, like I said, these are relatively minor nots compared to the problems trying to tie the prequels and the originals together (for example, nearly everything Obi-wan says to Luke in episode IV makes no sense taken in the context of the prequels), but it's pretty clear that the original movie was written as a stand-alone, and the plot twists in later movies were not planned for in the original.

Comment: Inconsistencies between IV and V (Score 1) 175

by mbessey (#38798657) Attached to: Star Wars Uncut Project Complete

The most obvious problem is that in Episode IV, Darth Vader killed Luke's Father. In Episode V, it's "revealed" that Darth is Luke's father. It's not "impossible" to reconcile, but Obi-wan saying "what I told you was true, from a certain point of view", is an obvious attempt to wallpaper over this inconsistency. Best case, it just makes Obi-wan look like a liar and untrustworthy.

Another issue comes up when Obi-wan's ghost and Yoda are discussing Luke's running off to save his friends at Cloud City:
Yoda: Told you I did. Reckless is he. Now, matters are worse.
Obi-Wan: That boy is our last hope.
Yoda: No. There is another.

Seriously? Obi-wan doesn't remember that Luke has a twin sister?

Anyway, those are just off the top of my head. Nothing like the horrible plot holes ewhen you try to connect the prequels with the original movies, but not great for movies that were made one after the other, a couple of years apart.

Comment: The problem is the cost of the batteries (Score 1) 503

by mbessey (#38464282) Attached to: Tesla Motors Announces Prices For Their Upcoming Models

Swapping out Li-Ion batteries isn't like swapping out propane tanks. The value of a propane tank is basically $0, plus the cost of the propane. The cost structure on the batteries is exactly the opposite - the charge is essentially free, but the batteries cost thousands of dollars.

In order for battery-swapping to make sense, the same entity has to own all of the batteries, or there needs to be careful tracking and accounting for wear and tear on each battery. Otherwise, there's an economic incentive to cheat.

Comment: Re:Don't be stupid (Score 1) 808

by mbessey (#38425214) Attached to: GPL, Copyleft Use Declining Fast

I'm not talking about releasing a few apps and libraries here and there while keeping the system core proprietary. I'm talking about getting complete system build without reimplementing a proprietary decade of development history from scratch.

Way to move the goalposts, there. Your original statement was that Apple was "not contributing anything back to the community", and that's clearly not the case.

Apropos of this discussion, look at one of the lists and see what sorts of licenses those projects are licensed under. The majority are APSL, which means that they're Apple-developed code which was released to the wider community without any requirement to do so. Of the remaining, about one third are BSD licensed, a third are GPL, and the rest are a variety of other licenses.

Note that the BSD-licensed code doesn't carry any requirement for Apple to release their source code, either. You might wish that Apple would release more of their code under an Open Source license, but that doesn't mean they're benefitting from Open Source without contributing back.

"Success covers a multitude of blunders." -- George Bernard Shaw