Fuck you for off-topic post
Travelled down Slashdot and back again
Your post is troll, you're an anonymous coward.
And if you got first post
on every story you see
You would see the negative mod come from me
and the moderation would say, fuck you for off-topic post.
I thought the point of the FSM was to ridicule Christians?
You thought wrong. The point of the FSM is to highlight the deficiencies of creationism/Intelligent Design. Not all Christians are creationists/Intelligent Design protagonists, and I'm not even sure that all creationists/ID protagonists are Christians.
.... tried to change the wording after hitting submit, but only got half-way through. Has hell frozen over yet? I'm still waiting for an edit button.
I've been waiting for edit,
I've been waiting so long.
I've been waiting for edit,
and the search goes on.
I think you mean "another guy who also wasn't named Satoshi Nakamoto".
Although thinking of it, maybe his name really is Satoshi Nakamoto, and he made up that pseudonym story so that no one would guess he was the one who created Bitcoin; after all, who would use his own name as pseudonym?
Slashdot does support Unicode. Just a very limited subset of all characters.
And the correct answer is, of course, "no".
Case in point: "How Much Is Oracle To Blame For Healthcare IT Woes?" is a headline question which cannot be answered with "no".
Is GWU Econ Prof. Nick Szabo Satoshi Nakamoto what?
OK, the joke was that was all one person with a lot of names. I honestly didn't get it at first, since the question was clearly grammatically correct, and I'm a Grammar Nazi.
Stop being a Grammar Nazi. It's outdated. Today we have Grammar Jihadists.
Also, does it mean they can be sued?
Yeah, men in this family were always idiots.
You recognize that according to the bible, we all are in his family? So at least if you're a man, you might want to reconsider that statement.
Yes, I'm serious. And so is your lack of reading comprehension. Nowhere did I claim that "alot" is a word. Indeed, I did not say anything at all about whether "alot" is a word or not. I only wrote about the invalidity of the parent's method of deciding whether it is (by the existence of other words built the same way, which cannot work because the language is not entirely consistent to begin with), and pointed out the correct way to do it (consult a dictionary).
I've once heard that originally, besides the god Yahweh there was a goddess whose name I forgot. Yahweh was the god of war, and the goddess was the goddess for fertility.
to believe: to assume something is true despite not having sufficient evidence to support that assumption
Of course that only applies for monotheistic religions. In polytheism, it's easy: Our god favours us, and the other tribe's god favours them.