Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Export???? (Score 1) 125

by mark-t (#49760617) Attached to: US Proposes Tighter Export Rules For Computer Security Tools

Sure... Quote only part of my post out of context, and state that you disagree with it as if it stood alone, all the while completely omitting the part where I said it would only matter if the site were located in the USA in the first place.

Obviously if the site is not hosted in the USA then there is no issue that the USA could have with the site... although the uploader of such content, *if located in the USA*, could still be held accountable for said export if they were able to identify them.

Comment: Re:A stolen idea, in my corporate acquisition? (Score 1) 79

by mark-t (#49760507) Attached to: Oculus Founder Hit With Lawsuit

If this guy really used Total Recall's confidential IP, which I'm not saying necessarily happened, but it seems like it may be possible, then Facebook's acquisition would be void... and they could sue the person they bought it from for no less than every single cent that they spent buying it out, probably with interest, and punative damages thrown in for good measure.

This company is working within what I understand is the legally permissable 5-year limitation on NDA's in the high technology industry (albeit only just barely), so if OR is really based on misappropriated IP from that company, then Facebook is no more authorized to use the tech without Total Recall's permission than this guy was authorized to sell it.

Comment: If the stuff was really confidential.... (Score 1) 79

by mark-t (#49760373) Attached to: Oculus Founder Hit With Lawsuit

... then Facebook is not really permitted to freely use that technology either, and they would have a case against the person they bought it from as well. Certainly they would at least be entitled to any monies they had already given the founder for rights to Occulus Rift, and punative damages could even be applicable.

Total Recall could, of course, license the tech to Facebook, and probably make a tidy profit while doing so.

Comment: Forever is a long time.... (Score 1) 374

by mark-t (#49752051) Attached to: How Java Changed Programming Forever

... so I frankly doubt literal veracity of the headliine.

But I won't dispute that Java has changed the face of programming when comparing worlds before it existed and after, although many languages can make that claim, including C, and probably C++. I'd not be surprised if even BASIC could not be said to have had such a dramatic influence on programming. Fortran and COBOL would be up there as well, possibly even greater than most of the others combined.

Comment: Re:If I use an IDE, does it mean I'm a bad program (Score 1) 439

by mark-t (#49733307) Attached to: Choosing the Right IDE

It can... although usually I dock all my editor windows to one pane, and use tabs.... but the IDE I use allows me to add any number of panes.

It's interesting that many of the things you've mentioned are ideal for you actually are preferences of mine as well, and in fact, why I use the IDE that I do. It's written in Java, but it performs adequately on my hardware, which for me is all that really matters.

Comment: If I use an IDE, does it mean I'm a bad programmer (Score 4, Insightful) 439

by mark-t (#49730805) Attached to: Choosing the Right IDE
While I have coded without an IDE in the past, and I still do it occasionally for one-off throwaway programs, when it comes to larger projects, I do find that having an IDE dramatically boosts my productivity. All of the things I do with an IDE could theoretically also be done with vi and an appropriate suite of tools, but for myself, the point of using an IDE is to really just have it all bundled in as one, and not have to switch to a different window just to show a call graph or function definition for what is at the current cursor, for example, when a simple hover-window can do the same thing, and since the window disappears as soon as I start typing or otherwise navigating, I don't even need to switch windows again when I resume editing.

Comment: Re:I don't understand.. (Score 1) 221

TIR in a fiber requires the core to have a higher index of refraction than the cladding. If the core is hollow and surrounded by glass, light that is not traveling exactly parallel to the core edge will escape the core. When the propagation speed of light is lowere in the core, at sufficiently obtuse angles, the light that would otherwise escape the core simply bounces off the core's edges, enabling it to go for long distances even if the fiber is not perfectly straight

Comment: Re:I don't understand.. (Score 1) 221

Where in my comment did I suggest that solid fibers would communicate faster? I said being solid is necessary for it to function, but I did not say it was faster. The engadget article that was linked to by the comment is extremely sparse on the physics involved, so I am most perplexed about how the cable manages to keep light from escaping... TIR is not possible with a hollow core, so they have to be exploiting some other phenomenon with which I am unfamiliar to achieve the result of guiding the signal through the fiber. That said, I would be surprised if there were not some pretty narrow limits on the types of communication possible (maybe in the form of acceptable frequencies) and probably the distances that high fidelity communication is possible, particularly on a cable that has many twists and turns.

Per buck you get more computing action with the small computer. -- R.W. Hamming

Working...