Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Reasonably, how long would a solar eclipse last (Score 1) 59

And you realize that the arctic and antarctic circles do not account individually account for a very large percentage of the earth's surface that continues to receive sunlight while they are in darkness, right? The planet, as a whole, still receives heat from the sun.

Comment: Re:Reasonably, how long would a solar eclipse last (Score 1) 59

Thank you... that's exactly the sort of statistics I was wondering about. So it's survivable, but probably regularly quite chilly. Basically, you'd get short period of winter like weather at least once every orbit, regardless of the actual season based on its orientation to the sun.

Comment: They don't really mean what they are saying.... (Score 1) 280

by mark-t (#47762277) Attached to: Comcast Tells Government That Its Data Caps Aren't Actually "Data Caps"
"...customers will have the ability to buy as much data as they want"

Because taken at face value, that comment means that they should be offering customers as much money as they need to get all of the data that their customers want. After all, if a customer don't have enough money to pay for it, then they don't really have the ability to buy it, do they?

Comment: Reasonably, how long would a solar eclipse last? (Score 2) 59

I can easily envisiion a situation where an entire moon is plunged into shadow as it orbits a gas giant. This would, I presume, cause temperatures to fall for the duration of the eclipse, and if it lasted too long, I can imagine that such a regular occurrence would likely make the moon inhospitable to life as we know it, even if it is the right distance from the sun to support liquid water, and even if it had an appropriate gravitational pull and atmosphere.

Comment: Re:Steering wheels are nice, but... (Score 1) 456

by mark-t (#47760201) Attached to: California DMV Told Google Cars Still Need Steering Wheels
Yes... so there would have to be a statistically measurable difference between accident rates from people who have automated cars vs people who drive them manually. This will take quite a long time for enough data to be collected to have statistical significance with respect to the actual number of automobiles that are on the road.

Comment: Re:Legislating Technology (Score 1) 226

by mark-t (#47758797) Attached to: California Passes Law Mandating Smartphone Kill Switch
That's only applicable if the key is the same for each and every device. The key itself can still be set uniquely for each device, and put into an eeprom circuit that is built into the device's hardware, and not changeable simply by swapping out any IC's that would not also amount to basically swapping out the entire innards of the phone. In the end, the only useful component of such a bricked phone would be its casing... making theft unprofitable, and when it's common enough, hopefully discouraging such theft from occurring in the first place.

Comment: Re:Legislating Technology (Score 1) 226

by mark-t (#47757775) Attached to: California Passes Law Mandating Smartphone Kill Switch

Unless there's a hardware component (say a physical key you need to insert into a slot on the side of the phone) ....

What about having to physically enter a passcode on the device's keypad? The locking itself can be in software, but that locking software can easily be hardcoded onto the silicon, and not something you can bypass with any software technique.

Comment: Re:Who cares? (Score 1) 226

by mark-t (#47756781) Attached to: California Passes Law Mandating Smartphone Kill Switch
The Android app does not lock the phone, it erases it. The phone itself would still be usable once you replace the sim card. The point of the law is to make the theft of protected cell phones unprofitable by requiring that the functionality be embedded into the device itself, and make the phone unusable for anything beyond making an emergency call, or using the keypad to enter in the appropriate unlock code.

Despite all appearances, your boss is a thinking, feeling, human being.

Working...