Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Locality of self. (Score 1) 252

Yes, I believe you've hit upon the key problem with all this. Leaving aside all the daunting difficulty is making a true copy, the result would only benefit your survivors, not you. Now that's no small accomplishment, but it most certainly falls short of immortality.

Another element that is frequently overlooked is that our brains are embedded in our bodies. Proprioception depends on all the real-time feedback from the stuff that's outside the brain. So without simulating the rest of us as well, the uploaded copy might have consciousness but it wouldn't feel or act like we do in the slightest. Even your survivors wouldn't be fooled for long.

Comment Re:They made the disclosure (Score 1) 229

They sent me a heads up email with a link to the new policy. So they're being up front about it. That said, I don't care for it. I've used their free version for probably close to 10 years, but I'll be looking for a replacement soon. Avast? Microsoft Essentials? Dunno. In all that time, I think AVG gave me one false positive and once it failed to warn me of something that I could immediately see was suspicious. Not a single true positive, IIRC. My sense is that the threats these days are much more sophisticated than the AV software supposedly keeping us safe. AV software has become like the life vests under the seat in airplanes. There's a remote chance that it will save you some day, but that's about it. Safe practices in browsing and email are probably orders of magnitude more important.

Comment Comments from a former MUMPS programmer (Score 4, Informative) 166

I used MUMPS (and MIIS) extensively while working in healthcare in the 80s and 90s. It was an efficient programming and database environment for mini-computers which combined a hierarchical database and interpreted language with sparse arrays and extensive pattern-matching capabilities baked in. It was widely used in hospitals for clinical operations and that legacy is still present in healthcare. The language itself would scare the shit out of anybody using modern technologies (self-modifying code, anyone?), but used with discipline it ran many applications that were literally a matter of life or death for patients. Some variants (MIIS, DEC) were also stand-alone operating systems running on the bare metal. It gave you lots of bang for the buck, even if the code itself looked like a printer test. There used to be a small but active community of vendors and users. Today, there is one large player, Epic Systems, which dominates the applications market, especially in the electronic medical records area. They use Intersystems MUMPS (now known as M) as the underlying language; it has an extensive application building environment on top of the basic language to provide relational, Web and object-oriented abstractions. You can build applications in this environment without ever touching MUMPS code, though commercial applications will generally drop down into MUMPS for special purpose routines.

Comment Re: Google (Score 3, Informative) 269

Well, maybe. What I know is that I don't see much spam even in my spam folder, which does suggest that Gmail may be blowing a lot of stuff away before I have any chance to see it. OTOH, I don't ever recall a case of learning later that something legitimate had been deleted instead of put into my spam folder, and the number of false positives there is tiny. My overall impression is that their filtering system is very effective. I haven't seen a true spam message in my inbox for years and don't even think of it as a problem anymore.

Comment And OJ offers a reward to find the real killer (Score 5, Insightful) 236

My first reaction was that it was like OJ Simpson offering a reward to find the real killer. But then I took off my snarky goggles and on reflection, I realized that given government, corporate and media interests and manipulation there's no way in hell we'll ever know the truth. Sad but true, I'm afraid.

Comment Good news for Leopard users (Score 1) 99

I don't think any software vendor should be required to support software forever, but there is a difference between withdrawing support and disabling a product without ample prior warning. They blew the rollout, but it looks like they're going to make amends, at least for the Leopard crowd. Hopefully, they'll learn a thing or two about the value of good corporate communication as well.

Submission + - Skype Blocks Customers Using OS-X 10.5.x and Earlier 1

lurker412 writes: Yesterday, and without previous warning, all Mac users running Leopard or earlier versions of OS-X have been locked out of Skype. Those customers are given instructions to update, but following them does not solve the problem. The Skype Community Forum is currently swamped with complaints. A company representative active on the forum said "Unfortunately we don't currently have a build that OS X Leopard (10.5) users could use" but did not answer the question whether they intend to provide one or not. I had a chat exhange with a Skype rep, who told me that not only would there be no version for Leopard, but that refunds were not going to be given for those with paid balances "...outside of 15 day cooling off period," whatever that means. I'm not assuming that the chatbot really speaks for the company. I understand that software vendors cannot be expected to support products forever. But would a bit of advance warning be too much to ask?

Comment Re:Creative Suite Six will be Adobe's XP (Score 3, Interesting) 74

For me personally, you're quite right, though I'm on CS5 and will stay there for the foreseeable future. I'm an amateur photographer and have no need to keep up with the latest and greatest effects for graphic artists. There are a lot of Adobe customers like me, and many of us preferred the old model, where we could pay to upgrade when the new features seemed worth it. The new model makes sense for companies and design pros who (think they) always need the latest. They probably will save money. I'm not interested in the lock-in the new model imposes.

There is a lot of misunderstanding about the "cloudiness" of CC. The recent outage didn't take all the subscribers down, at least as long as they are using local storage for their work. The software runs locally. It would actually be a step forward if, say, they came up with some killer algorithms that require super-computer power to run and gave subscribers access to those cycles in the cloud. But currently, the cloud is mainly used for license validation (periodically) and software updates.

Adobe is leaving money on the table by not accommodating the customers who used to go for every other or every third update. I expect that within a couple of years they will realize this and come up with some sort of hybrid subscription/perpetual license scheme.

You are in a maze of UUCP connections, all alike.