Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:A bit too heavy IMHO... (Score 1) 318

by lukas.mach (#26703861) Attached to: Second Netbook Wave Begins
Go to a nearest shop and try to life the 9" eee and the 10" eee. It's a difference. I have a 1.45kg tablet and when it comes to its weight it's really only borderline usable. The 9" eee on the other hand has the perfect weight - light enough, yet not so light to be shaking when you're reading an e-book on bus.

Comment: Re:As per "Flamebait Story" (Score 2, Insightful) 271

by lukas.mach (#26502511) Attached to: Ubuntu's Laptop Killing Bug Fixed
You're writing "Wrong", but what you say isn't really in conflict with what I wrote. Yes, it's easier for a given developer to fix a bug in Linux software or in kernel/driver. Yes it's easier for them to achieve the perfect state where everything works according to specification/protocol. But when the ethernet card decides for no particular reason to send 1101 instead of 1100 every once in a couple of kBs, it's going to be a bigger deal in a cleanly designed system than in a self-repairing pile of junk.

Given that these kind of bugs will be corrected only when the manufacturers will sell more than say 25% of it's hardware to Linux clients, I humbly predict that these bugs will be fixe in approximately infinity years.

Comment: Re:As per "Flamebait Story" (Score 1) 271

by lukas.mach (#26502357) Attached to: Ubuntu's Laptop Killing Bug Fixed
Hardware will always have bugs and they always will be hard to fix. It's the OSes that should step up and act more like error correcting codes. Windows already kinda work like that - by being a monstrous pile of ugly hacks, it naturally gained resistance from relying on something external actually working.

Comment: what about packet loss? (Score 3, Interesting) 515

by lukas.mach (#26476039) Attached to: Ubuntu Download Speeds Beat Windows XP's
Fine, what is this then:

Windows (Cygwin):

$ ping -n 20

Pinging [] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=245
Ping statistics for
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 16ms


lukas@9a:~$ ping
PING ( 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ( icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=15.3 ms
--- ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 1 received, 95% packet loss, time 21003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.321/15.321/15.321/0.000 ms

Happens on my network no matter what I change - cables or notebooks, Vista runs ok, Ubuntu sucks big time. The only non-standard thing is that I have wired connection with manual IP address (connected by Linux based Asus router).

lukas@9a:~$ lspci | grep Eth
00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection (rev 03)