Any experienced sailor will tell you that there is no need to see the hidden part of the iceberg to consider giving it a wide berth.
The guy will upload 3D printer firmware, and demons from Doom will come out of the printer.
Are you implying that Sidekick was not a graphical interface? What about dosshell?
Those were great graphical interfaces, responsive and fluid. I remember switching to a larger monitor and being amazed to see that dosshell was still filling the whole screen. Nowadays you don't get that with those big fancy Apple monitors, people have to use non-maximized windows.
Did you try right-clicking on the Windows logo (former Start menu button) in Windows 8.1? A lot of things in that context menu were tedious to access in previous versions of Windows (such as the event viewer).
With that menu and the pinned icons on the start bar, I only occasionally need to search for another application, and it is a lot faster to use the search bar and type 2-3 letters than it was to deal with multi-level navigation in the old start menu.
given the major fuck ups with Windows Vista and 8 (7 was tolerably decent, though still a massive decay from Windows XP, which itself is like a decay from Windows 2000)
The past is always better. I don't know what went wrong at Microsoft to start doing those silly things like "Windows Services" instead of sticking with a proven technology like TSR. Was there even a need for Windows? I'm pretty sure that if there had been no Windows there would be a Sidekick extension available to display twitters and facebooks.
Let's all stop this progress madness NOW and focus instead on the sound principles of the Ordnung.
You have to try something.
1) Get drunk on dark liquor
2) Put on the song "Pick up the pieces" by Candy Dulfer. Loud.
3) Wear your 3D glasses
4) Play Supaplex
This will change your life forever.
Well I also believe that SLI is a Nvidia technology, I just checked and on ATI cards the equivalent was crossfire. I can't tell for sure which one it was, but this is more evidence to the fact that I've been using onboard vga adapters for quite a long time
Most recent operating systems will take care of saving power when the machine is idle, it won't make a noticeable difference what cpu you pick. Look instead at storage: SSD use between 1/3 or 1/4 of the power used by spinners.
Also if you look at energy efficiency buy one of those smart powerbars that will turn off power in groups (e.g. switching off the speakers when the tv is powered off). Something like a LCG5. This will have a much higher impact on your power bill than cherry-picking computer components.
You don't get comfortable quick... Over the last 10 years the only time I've decided to upgrade a mobo videocard was during a drunken weekend when for some reason I felt ashamed of having an item with a 4.5 score on the Windows Experience Index utility - I went out and bought a pair of high-end Radeon (with the SLI thing). About $600 to get a 9.1 score.
Fans were noisy and I was annoyed each time I had to move the computer because I could never tell in which card I should plug the main monitor. But Youtube videos sure looked good.
The scene happens in the office of Twitpic.
The CEO comes back from a bathroom break and sees the light flashing on his phone. He checks his voicemail. There is a message from someone at Twitter asking him to call back.
The CEO instantly slams down a big red button that has been sitting on his desk since Day 1. Immediately, his closest collaborator, the COO, receives a cryptic Tweet: "it's happening!". So the COO runs to the cupboard, moves around a few boxes of microwave popcorn and poptarts, then finds a bottle of champagne that has been gathering dust for the last 5 years. He puts the bottle in the fridge, then runs around the office to ask everyone to immediately proceed to the conference room.
The whole team is sitting around the speakerphone. Most are running numbers in their head. 1 billion? 200 millions? 10 millions? Just like they do every night before falling asleep, they think about the house they will buy for their mom and how good they will feel about it. They think about the pool parties in Vegas. The orgies with rockstars and supermodels. Fast cars. Loose women.
Then the lawyer picks up. The team hold their breath. At first there is some confusion because the lawyer does not remember why he left a message, he has to go check his dayplanner. Everybody in the team is amazed about this. Some think that since buying a company is something so common that the lawyer can't keep track of potential acquisitions then it's a done deal and maybe they will get the money quickly. Maybe before Christmas. Maybe before the rent is due on October 1st.
Then the lawyer comes back on the line, and within 2 minutes the hopes and dreams of the team are crushed. They did not win the startup lottery. They failed.
Then one by one the team members leave the room, and the office. The CEO and the COO are alone in the room. But they refuse to give up. They open their laptop and go to www.whois.net. They try FacePic.com, GooglePic.com, and many other names. And when they finally get one, they decide it's time to "pivot". Fire everyone, create a new logo, spend a week to revamp the GUI. And then try to win the startup lottery again.
Apple right now has $67 billion in cash and cash equivalents. Dell had to borrow the money for the buy out.
Apple market cap is about $618 billions. So they would need to find 551 billions to go private.
Dell buyout was about $25 billions. Last time I checked the setup was:
-Loan from banks: 50%
-Dell's company cash: 30%
-Loan from Microsoft: 10%
-Private equity (Silver Lake): 7%
-Michael Dell's own money: 3%
To achieve the same kind of setup, here is what it would mean for Apple:
-Loan from banks: 309 billions
-Apple's cash: 185 billions (3x what they have according to you)
-Loan from Microsoft (or other partner, provided Apple has any): 61 billions
-Private equity (Silver Lake) 43 billions
-Tim Cook's own money: 18 billions
Apple has a buyback program but it's not making a dent.
Not making a dent in what? Apples stock is at an all time high.
The purpose of a buyback program is to BUY BACK stock to progressively regain a higher % of ownership of the company. The higher the stock price, the lower the effect of the buyback. Apple spent about 44 billions to buy back some of its stock over the last year. But it did not make a huge difference.
I'm not sure what agenda you are talking about. Is that some kind of lame accusation of being involved in PR for one of the companies I mentioned? Because that's the typical response from fanbois and other zealots whenever someone is not bending over and praising their false idols.
Your emperor has no clothes, it's a greedy corporation with a lousy track record for security and no concern for their customers. Saying that is not a blasphemy or a PR operation, it's just the naked truth.
It's like you think that going private is a bad thing or is a sign of financial struggle. But it's quite the opposite; a company that goes public is basically borrowing money from a shitload of small investors, and giving away the control of the company to a group of board members elected by the investors. And from that point there is an ongoing conflict between the people in the company who want to work on long term projects and the investors who want to see the stock price go up and to receive higher dividends quarter after quarter.
Going private for a public company is difficult because the company needs the money to buy back all their stock in one big swoop, and they have to do that more or less at the current market price, which may be insanely higher than the amount of money the company got at their IPO. So the company needs to have tons of cash, a somehow realistic market cap (i.e how much money is needed to buy back the stock) and private investors who believe in the future of the company enough to pour billions in the operation.
So Apple has never been in a position to go private, even if they had wanted to. When the stock price was low the company had no cash and no investors would take the risk, and when the stock price started to skyrocket even with the good annual profit it was still too expensive. Apple has a buyback program but it's not making a dent. The stock price is way too high for the actual value of the company, and that does not mean the company is not making good products, it just means that investors have unrealistic growth expectations.
The Apple bubble will burst sooner or later. It won't be a bad thing because then maybe the company will be in a position to start innovating again, with less pressure from investors to deliver huge sales every quarter. Then maybe they will have the opportunity to do like Dell, but I doubt it because Apple never had the kind of cash Dell has.
Don't put iCloud in the same category as Dropbox, OneDrive or Google Drive. iCloud is a joke and people use it only because it's bundled with the iDevices and shoved down people's throat (like IE).
Apple has a culture of nonchalance and carelessness because they have a strong brand and a captive customer base. Shame on them for putting their users in a tough spot and not caring about it.
Most cloud providers offer a very secure hosting environment. Apple should do the right thing: forget their iCloud and build instead a partnership with a company that knows how to operate cloud services. Just like Netflix had the guts to pull the plug on their own infrastructure and leverage AWS.
Last week I broke my Nexus. As I was shopping for a new unlocked phone I was astonished by the price differences.
iPhone 5S: $780
Galaxy S5: $580
Nokia 1520: $500
Nexus 5: $350
Yet the actual hardware is not in line with the prices; as an example most of the non-Apple devices in that list have twice the RAM as the iPhone and a much more powerful chip (such as quadcore Snapdragon vs a basic dual-core A7). Or for devices with the same OS, the difference in hardware does not really make up for the difference in price.
For the record I ended up buying a refurb Samsung S4 for $200. It feels less elegant and more clumsy than a Nexus, and it took me a long time to get rid of the Samsung bloatware, but it does the job and it does not get as warm. And next time I buy a phone I will definitely have a look at the sub-$100 devices to see how things have evolved. Who needs a $800 phone? Even $500 feels absurd.