Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Tempest in a tea pot (Score 1) 215

The "big deal" (from some people's perspective), is that while programs are math -- programs are "algorithms". They are processes that turn data into a result. Those who want to collect royalties for everything we do want to claim that since algorithms are processes that are discovered or found, then they are patentable.

So they lobby congress to create laws to protect their "intellectual property"... Congress, in turn makes such laws -- whether or not it makes sense is a different matter, but congress is owned by corporate interests and does what it is told.

Comment: moral attitude is "Just". It's constitutional. (Score 1) 707

by lpq (#43756617) Attached to: Google Demands Microsoft Pull YouTube App For WP8

True if you are republishing the content.

If you are an end-user and are using a tool that removes line-noise from a video stream, and I categorize "advertising" as line noise, you have no rights to what part of your video stream I choose to watch. If you distribute a newspaper, you can't force people to read the ads.

If they choose to block them by not reading them -- that is their right -- just as it is your right to put ads in your content if you so choose. In the US we have a law protecting freedom of expression -- it does not include the right to force someone to listen to what you have to say.

Comment: Re:3D Printer Ctl -- control of "Printing Press?" (Score 2) 856

by lpq (#43702587) Attached to: California Lawmaker Wants 3-D Printers To Be Regulated

Seems to me a 3D printer has more in common with a printing press. What you do with it is whatever, and I could see the same issues with government wanting to control printing presses. Which is more dangerous, the pen or the sword? The written word has proven capable of changing and steering countries and civilizations, not to mention inciting people to violence (though spoken seems more likely to do that).

Should we ban those as well? Oh... some countries already do ban free speech and publishing.. and most forms of media are already state controlled...

People need to stop looking at the printing of a gun as being some sort of big deal. It's like building a gun. Period. Is it really a big deal? It's been done millions of times throughout history. The fact that a 3d printers lower the costs for home production of anything, is likely what is more at issue. If you can produce a gun, why not a bicycle or a car? Sure, you might have to go down to the 3d-printer center to borrow some time on a large-printer for some parts, but the idea that manufacturing wouldn't be locked away from home users or the masses? Why isn't that as radical an idea as the home printer -- or the home computer? Couldn't those easily have societal altering effects far beyond the ability to make weapons?

Comment: Re:They already did this best thing they could (Score 1) 109

by lpq (#43518521) Attached to: Improving the Fedora Boot Experience

"and making the shut off time in under 3 seconds"...

My server runs squid and transmission and by DEFAULT, both have
shutdown timeouts around 10-20 seconds which they usually try to take.

---
No more being able to boot single user from the root disk

No more being able to bring up the system 1 service at a time in
single-step mode to debug a problem.

-------
Yeah systemd was so fast when it tried to boot my system -- it mounted
the local file systems before running lvm.

For some reason that didn't work.

Can't seem to mount /usr from root either... Great thing that systemd -- turns a working system into a door stop.

Comment: Re:All these authentication measures want my cell (Score 1) 132

by lpq (#43484075) Attached to: Microsoft Hops On Two-Factor Authentication Bandwagon

Ditto on the above. It's bothersome enough that they have the presumption that I have one BUT worse, once they have it, they can add automatic tracking of my location to their database if I have location services enabled on the phone. AFAIK, that's open all the time the phone is on -- unlike, 'theoretically', the emergency location transponder that is enabled when you use emergency services.

Isn't such such tracking considered a feature for those using the phone to take location-labeled pictures?

Comment: Re:As a programmer, I disagree. (Score 1) 254

by lpq (#43467003) Attached to: Taking the Pain Out of Debugging With Live Programming

Have to agree -- if I had points I'd mark you up for Insightful.

Debugging doesn't take alot of though -- sure, if you emulate the code
in your head -- which gets close to the work in designing but the way
most people do it (and I do it for most simple debug tasks).. is fairly low-brain power stuff. Hard problems -- they can be both a bear and
fun -- i.e. they are brain teasers.

As for the statement about being clever up front -- depends on definitions, but usually the more clever I am up front, the less code I need to write -- and there is less to debug. That said, clever up to and past the point of "obscure", ... it's not the debugging that is so hard -- it's trying to figure
out what the heck you were trying to do when you want to enhance or update it. For the most part, even on my own personal projects, I
try to write with long var names, and/or an occasional comment if something is unclear or not str8forward.

But a year or two after the fact in coding -- I look at it, and wonder, did I write this? Only because my coding style changes over time (not formatting, but idiomatic usage).

Also, on a real "project", I'll usually build in a debug framework as I code.

Code has to be able to be examined and testable. So hooks are usually needed.

Comment: Re:Software developer!=Software engineer!=Engineer (Score 1) 419

Mark the above guy up!!!

When have you been able to order a stock size "ISO-sized" algorithm to combine some standardized Unicode Data and process it to yield any meaningful or useful standard output?

Engineering is about fitting well established parts and concepts together, allow for standard tolerances in the specs of those parts, and combining them into a unified whole.

While that is close to what Software Design is, I don't think anyone has ever attempted to quantify nor deal with software parts "standard deviation" from some standard, nor is such usually even quantized, because at the digital level, it is believed that all is 0 or 1, therefore the program as a whole must fail or pass as a reflection of the smallest part.

To design software to be "redundant" or "fault tolerant" of the component pieces it is made up from would be considered the height of folly. The last time such redundancy was in vogue, we went to the moon and back, and look where that got us... ;-|

Comment: Re:Windows 7 better? (Score 1) 712

by lpq (#43405253) Attached to: Set Your Watches For the End of Windows XP

And then there's the weird problem where it randomly kicks itself off the domain and you have to go to the machine, unjoin it from the domain, delete all DNS and AD entries of that machine off the server, and then go back to the machine and re-join it.

I had this problem with a single Samba Primary Domain server and turning off win7's ability to change it's own password (for the machine), stopped this problem.

Then there's the 64/32-bit crossover problem which means we can't run both unless we segregate them into different OUs and policies because on 32-bit systems GP deployed software goes into "Program Files" and on 64-bit systems it goes into "Program Files (x86)" which breaks certain global icons and scripts (Why didn't they put everything in the same place? Is there some reason to split the 64 and 32 bit Program Files? And even if there is, why not leave "Program Files" for 32-bit stuff and add "Program Files (64-bit)" instead??), and don't get me started on the minefeld of mixing 32 and 64-bit printer drivers!

Oh yeah... but here's the flip side. You have a native 64-machine coming in -- do you use or 64? I.e. on linux they usually have been pushing 64-bit into /lib64 and /usr/lib64, and using /lib and /usr/lib for 32-bit. But as less than 10% of packages are 32-bit on my 64bit machines, I'd rather have the 32bit with the longer path and use the shorter path for native programs. But when I did the switch on windows 7, I felt the same as you. Urg! Screwed either way!

Comment: What's wrong with IMAP? (Score 1) 282

by lpq (#43322219) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Best Way To Archive and Access Ancient Emails?

Dovecot handles all the formats you mentioned, mbox, maildir, etc...

Then access everything w/IMAP.

I keep everything in mbox format...going back to 1999....

Things are very hierarchical. I don't keep everything. List mails
go into list-boxes and I read them like newsgroups.

I have multiple levels of personal mail.....sorta like google's circles...
but unrelated to that...

Keep it all in /home/lpq/mail ... about 5.1G of it...

Comment: Re:The Samsung reference is long debunked (Score 1) 154

It wasn't a bug in the kernel, it was a bug in Samsung's UEFI Bios.

The UEFI BIOS has a place for persistent variable storage. On the Samsung, it had code that checked if *anything* had stored info such that there was 50% space in the variable section. If that happened, the unit self-bricked.

You can point the finger at Linux and say it pushed the computer over the edge, but the problem was in designing a computer that effectively self-bricks when it's internal HD gets over 50% space. Of course, if you install another OS like Linux, it will take some space -- but that doesn't make the information responsible for the bad design.

Comment: Banning all head-up displays in Vehicles? (Score 1) 375

by lpq (#43286573) Attached to: Lawmakers Seek To Ban Google Glass On the Road

Hmmm.... no heads-up displays in vehicles?...

Weren't heads-up displays supposed to be safer than having to move your eyes away from the reality-display you need to be viewing at the same time?

Will this also cause air force pilots with such displays in the cockpit and helmets to no longer fly over or in such states??

Seems only prudent...

*hmmm*...

Comment: Re:Why do dogs lick their balls? (Score 1) 307

by lpq (#43198185) Attached to: Should We Be Afraid of Google Glass?

Because they are dogs?

As for wearers of glasses, violence will push faster development of the camera's as ocular implants. Then you'll have to wonder if you are being recorded any time someone looks in your direction (not even necessarily *at you*, but anywhere in their field of vision). Then we can see such violent prone people punching anyone who even looks in their direction.

That will, in turn, prompt 24 hour surveillance of them as they are remanded to prison for the protection of society.

 

When in panic, fear and doubt, Drink in barrels, eat, and shout.

Working...