Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score 2, Interesting) 612

by llirik (#26622919) Attached to: Microsoft Says H-1B Workers Among Those Losing Jobs
That's bogus.

I used to be an H1B holder, and one day decided to switch employer and start working for startup. The visa transfer application has been filed, I quit my job and moved to startup, without waiting for application to be approved (which is legal, as transfer considered to be pure formality). Few months later my transfer application gets refused on the grounds that startup doesn't seem to have profits and may fire me. Thank you very much Department of Labor for firing me out of fear that my employer may fire me.

One can argue that its my fault, and I had to wait for transfer to get approved, but that's not the point. I knew that I was taking a risk, and was prepared, but to get refusal on such grounds? That's pretty lame.

Anyways, getting back on topic. Suppose I were the best developer in the company and in rough times company had to downsize, but they would like to keep me and get rid of some slackers, however some legislation wouldn't allow them to do so, so they have to fire me. I pack my stuff move back home, and then economy picks up, there is shortage of qualified people in US, and US companies start to bombard me with offers. Do you honestly believe I would go there again?

It is very shortsighted policy, you are risking to alienate the most qualified people. Way to go.

Another argument against it -- it is pretty much unenforcible. What will business do? They'll just create new entity and move all H1B holders they would like to keep to that new entity. Oh, big brother patches this loophole? Fine. They'll create an independent "consultancy" business and move all H1B holders there, and hire them as consultants. I am sure there are thousand tricks to work around such restrictions.

The Almighty Buck

Bandwidth Use In MMOs 188

Posted by Soulskill
from the more-always-more dept.
Massively is running a story about bandwidth costs for MMOs and other virtual worlds. It's based on a post at the BBC on the same subject which references a traffic analysis (PDF) done for World of Warcraft. Quoting: "If you're an average user on capped access, the odds are you have roughly 20Gbytes per month to allocate among all of your Internet usage (it varies depending on just where you are). For you, sucking back (for example) a 2GB World of Warcraft patch isn't something you can just do. It's something you have to plan for — and quite often you have to plan for in the following month. Even a 500MB download has to be handled with caution. MMOGs as a rule don't use a whole lot of bandwidth in actual operation. However, the quantity definitely rises in busy areas with lots of players, where there are large numbers of mobs, or on raids, and takes quite a much larger jump if you're using voice as well."
Networking (Apple)

Leopard bug - SMB share access broken

Submitted by RMH101
RMH101 writes "I've just setup my new Macbook Pro with Leopard 10.5.1 and have noticed a killer problem: it doesn't work with my NAS and SMB shares, in fact SMB seems fairly comprehensively broken. Googling around, it seems I'm not alone: there's a fair number of people with the same problem, and Apple don't have a fix: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5922282
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies-archive.cfm/848405.html
Main problem: when I connect to my (open, non password-protected) NAS SMB share via Finders "Go To Server" and SMB://my.nas.ip.address, it'll let me view the open shares on that device. However, opening one shows it as having blank contents. Creating a new folder within that folder via Finder causes the "New Folder" icon to appear for a split second, then vanish. The same NAS SMB shares work fine when accessed from OS X Tiger, Ubuntu, XP — and even from the Leopard machine via virtualised XP under Parallels — even showing the "New Folder" mentioned above.
What the hell is going on?

I've also noticed problems with the autodiscovery of network shares under Leopard, with devices appearing and disappearing in the sidebar randomly, and am failing to connect to open SMB shares on Windows boxes, too: it asks to authenticate as Guest or named user, and fails on both.

Is anyone else seeing similar issues, and more importantly has anyone got a fix? This has broken networking so badly that I'm going to have to revert to Tiger until one appears."
AMD

AMD Barcelona Opteron Native Quad-Core Launched->

Submitted by
MojoKid
MojoKid writes "AMD has officially launched their new Barcelona core Opteron quad-core processors today and specific model numbering details as well as speeds and feeds have emerged. These new, native quad-core AMD processors have 2MB of shared L3 cache on board, in addition to 512KB per-core L2 caches and a top core speed currently at 2GHz. Also, in a move reminiscent of their campaign from long ago to debunk the "megahertz myth" with processor performance rating-type model numbers, AMD is announcing a new power consumption metric called "ACP" or "Average CPU Power". Finally, details of next generation AMD 45nm Shanghai quad-core and Sandtiger octal-core CPUs are listed here as well."
Link to Original Source

I didn't do it! Nobody saw me do it! Can't prove anything! -- Bart Simpson

Working...