Those who posture screw those who innovate is nothing new. Whatever your opinion on who best execute plans, the point is, shady behavior triumphed at a business prize centered around ethical business practices to do social good. Their entire mandate and philosophy formulated as a response to the financial crisis. All Hult had to do was select a team without controversy and make an effort not to look like dicks at the Clinton Global Foundation. How the foundation and the winning team can comfortably fail such a easy requirement and confidently ride through the criticism while hiding behind carefully crafted legal statements like all other ethical crisis in the business world is a further reflection on how blatantly fucked and the entire structure is.