Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Comment: Very poor idea (Score 5, Informative) 125

by littleghoti (#26730577) Attached to: Web of Trust For Scientific Publications
What is important is *anonymous* peer review. There needs to be a mechanism for new scientists to question established researchers without lasting detriment to their careers. On another note, what I thought this article might be about was CiteULike, which is great. Any academics should check it out

Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.