Forgot your password?

Comment: Very poor idea (Score 5, Informative) 125

by littleghoti (#26730577) Attached to: Web of Trust For Scientific Publications
What is important is *anonymous* peer review. There needs to be a mechanism for new scientists to question established researchers without lasting detriment to their careers. On another note, what I thought this article might be about was CiteULike, which is great. Any academics should check it out

The flow chart is a most thoroughly oversold piece of program documentation. -- Frederick Brooks, "The Mythical Man Month"