Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Alternate title (Score 1) 95

So you are stating in a story that a free internet meant to be given to the poor, from a For Profit Company, however being blocked by the government because it has interests in keeping the underclass out of power, and probably have ties with other telecom companies, to block competition because they are offer lower price as a key competitive advantage. Is showing the evils of capitalism. Where in this case free market is motivated to provide free infrastructure in order to increase revenue from services offered.

Stop over simplifying things. Unregulated capitalism is bad, Over regulated capitalism is just as bad too. The details is important, not the political stance.

Comment Re:The technical problems with this are immense. (Score 1) 299

Why not go all out and just evacuate the wings for maximum lift? Moron.

AFAIK the problem is if you make it big enough for the effect to be meaningful, it takes up too much space. So my question phrased more properly is, can you just stack them, or is there some property which makes that infeasible?

Comment Re:Establishment clause (Score 1) 245

No, sorry, that's not true. "Your community" has no input into whether you build 300 ft structures on your 1000 ac of private property out in unincorporated land.

HAW HAW HAW

Tell you what. Go forth and give it a shot, and see how it goes — make sure to defend it to the bitter end. You won't have to get back to us to let us know how it went, because you'll be on the news.

Comment Re:Surprise (Score 1) 190

It's actually kinda awkward to draw any conclusions from that as adjusting for other factors isn't trivial.

Imagine, for a second, if A causes B, but only when combined with C, D or E. (And C, D, and E don't cause anything on their own, only when combined with A)

A is going to look like a cause of B, but C, D, or E will be relatively difficult to correlate with B, especially if they're common. That may result in people assuming that, say, C had nothing to do with B simply because A was present.

I know, I know, basic stats and all of that, and I doubt video games are causing (much) harm (nothing's completely harmless ;-)) but I'd be more comfortable with more studies.

Comment Re:Unearned Platforms Given to Moral Guardians (Score 1) 190

For the most part I'd agree with this, but you might be underplaying her skepticism a little by saying she isn't arguing "poor representations of women in games make people harm women in real life".

She certainly is arguing that poor representations of women in games contributes to general atmosphere that ends up resulting in tox... uh, I better avoid academic jargon that's widely (deliberately?) misunderstood here.. behaviors by many that are harmful to women. She also points out I believe that such tropes tend to put off many women, who would otherwise be much more confortable dropping $60 on your latest blockbuster, but feel excluded from the non-casual space as a result.

But Sarkeesian is also clear that a few sexist tropes in games are not solely responsible for harm done to women, that they don't exist in a vaccuum, and that it's entirely possible to enjoy a game and find a few tropes in it a little dubious.

The biggest point I'd make to people who think, after being told by numerous YouTube "personalities" that Sarkeesian is an advocate of censorship, is that Sarkeesian's criticisms are constructive criticisms. She's not demanding bans or boycotts, she's saying "Hey, game developers, here's a few things you might want to avoid", and telling players "Listen, I know you love this game, just be aware of these issues when you play it."

(Game developers actually love her videos in my experience, which tells you all you need to know.)

Unfortunately, we don't live in a world where nuanced comments that are neither "BAN THIS!" nor "WE WANT MORE OF THIS!!" are understood. Most people seem to think that every argument has two sides, no more, no less.

Comment Re:Anything the US does is suspicious (Score 1) 252

Is there any evidence that Un is actually insane? He maintains a power structure that benefits himself, by having it also benefit those around him so that they have a vested interest in maintaining it too. That is rather different to mental illness though.

They're going down a road with nothing good at the end, and they have ample examples to see that. How is it not mental illness?

Comment Re:Nuclear Cargo Ships (Score 1) 299

The little problem with this option and with the current international laws at sea is that after about 30-40 years ship wrecks are often sunk at some place nobdoy looks at.

Yeah, you would have to put some serious controls on the system. It isn't going to happen any time soon. Under current systems you'd basically have to have the military operate such vessels.

Comment Re:The technical problems with this are immense. (Score 1) 299

Turbines are better if you need steady thrust and can tolerate high rotational velocities. So they work fine for large airplanes, but are not that useful for VTOL aircraft (which is the goal here).

VTOL is not a must-have, it's a nice-to-have. It's not like we haven't room for airstrips. We have.

They are also extremely expensive.

Sure, but so are batteries. Money gets spent all over.

Comment Re:Establishment clause (Score 1) 245

f I wanted to place a 300 foot cross on my property in my neighborhood, I wouldn't be allowed. If I wanted to pan for gold, I wouldn't be allowed.

Generally, you can do both of those things on private property. You are restricted from doing them if you bought your property without mineral rights or if you bought property where there are CC&Rs or zoning restrictions.

Actually, you're only half right. You're right about the panning for gold, but absolutely not about the cross. Any structure that large will surely fall afoul of some kind of restriction. You will at minimum require a permit. You can't just go off half-cocked and do it. There will be meetings, and your community will decide if you can build something that big. If someone complains there will be more meetings.

Comment Re:Unhelpful Whining (Score 1) 245

as for the negative consequences, maybe they didn't want a large industrial installation on top of what the local community feels is a natural resource?

No. No, that is not at all possible. That is not possible because there is already a large industrial installation on top of what the local community used to use as a natural resource, also known as a rock quarry. The local community doesn't use the site at all now; it's actually set aside specifically for building telescopes.

Comment Re:The difference between abstraction and reality (Score 2) 245

That's my point. Ours tend to be the types that can keep to themselves. Theirs are the kind that can't.

What? No. There is no kind of religious type that can keep to itself once it gets the power to start forcing other people to live like them. There are some kinds of religious, though, whose beliefs inherently prevent them from amassing such power. You're not going to see the Amish forcing anyone to live like them any time soon because their religion forbids them taking up arms. They don't have the means, and their lifestyle forbids them acquiring them, so it's not going to happen.

The only thing that stops any particular Christian sect from going bad (they all have the same book more or less, so they all can justify any kind of bad behavior if they cross their eyes just right when they read it) is other competing sects, and the fact that their numbers are all dwindling. The only religion growing right now is Islam, and IMO that's only because they have a large captive audience to which they can sell their story. Depressed people are easy targets for religion. Bring up quality of life in the places they're making inroads and you'll see them falter rapidly. Nobody happy needs religion.

Comment Re: This is why we can't have nice things (Score 1) 245

In a city, sure. Rural land, not so much. Though it's changing as counties belly up to the bar.

Anywhere in Lake County, CA, it costs more in permits to build a single-bedroom dwelling than it does to buy the materials. There is some $30k in mandatory fees and permits involved. Lake County is rural by any definition. Welcome to America...

Comment Re:And for what? (Score 1) 245

Thanks for saying this, this is what I have said in basically every discussion on this subject so far. Why are we building bigger scopes on the planet when they belong on the far side of the moon, isolated from our light and radio noise? Yeah, it's a big project. Compared to going to Mars, landing the elements of a radio telescope array on the moon seems trivial... like a solved problem, really.

Slashdot Top Deals

"One lawyer can steal more than a hundred men with guns." -- The Godfather

Working...