Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Not good enough. (Score 0, Troll) 163

Every use of plea bargaining is an abuse. Everyone has a right to a trial, even those who are most definitely guilty of a crime.

Everyone already has the right to a trial; plea bargains do not take that right away. Accepting the plea bargain is optional for the defendant and can be particularly appealing for those who are "most definitely guilty."

so that it could be used as a bargaining chip to get them to comply with providing information about associates.

By giving people an incentive to lie about their fellow citizens. How is that supposed to be a good thing?

You're confusing "fellow citizens" with "accomplices" here.

The overall problem isn't plea bargains, or attempts by law enforcement to get suspects to turn on each other. There's nothing wrong with getting a robbery suspect to turn on his accomplices. The real problem is the silly little offenses that are prosecuted far beyond any semblance of reasonableness. Violating a website's TOS is obviously not the same as a real crime.

Comment Re:easy (Score 1) 480

He's obviously picking scenarios that support his predetermined viewpoint, ignoring the fact that most startups fail. We're not talking here about getting hired into a successful company at a multimillion-dollar salary. This is about mortgaging one's home to try and build something, and creating opportunities for others in the process.

The ones h4rr4r refers to are nicknamed the "1%" (the wall-street version, that is) for a reason. They're in the vast minority.

Comment Re:"One laptop" program may be what you want (Score 1) 325

Brand new: More than a $150 tablet, but better than a $150 tablet that you can't use.

Not so new: (One of those looks like what I did all my high school & some college papers with).

Comment Re:There's nothing Darwin about it. (Score 2) 992

I have passed cars who were driving under the speed limit on winding back roads. It is pure chance that I did not crash into an oncoming car.

Then you're a moron. Except for the injuries that you'd have caused to that oncoming car's occupants, it's unfortunate that you didn't.

Slow drivers would just claim that it is their right to drive slow and the deaths from head-on collisions in the other lane are 100% the fault of the driver passing them...

And they'd be right. If you drive in the oncoming traffic lane and hit something, it is completely your fault. Your choice, your action, your fault. Live with it.

When you make your mark in the world, watch out for guys with erasers. -- The Wall Street Journal