I worked for a Dot-com that shared the building with a methadone clinic. I would not recommended it.
Just exactly how would one use it inappropriately? Inquiring minds must know.
You mean an OB/Gyn exam... same thing.
You can take the rich boy out of Europe but you can take the Eurotrash out of the boy.
"Now I'm not saying he should have killed her... but I understand." ~ Chris Rock
In the first place, it was unusual for an interlocutory appeal to be granted from the denial of the preliminary injunction motion. In federal court usually you can only appeal from a final judgment.
Similarly, apart from the fact that it's always rare for a certiorari petition to be granted, it's especially tough where the appeal is not from a final judgment, but just from a preliminary injunction denial which does not dispose of the whole case.
Works very well in some areas. Basically nullifies this article.
The last thing they need is more Californians. Try Portland or Tacoma.
I'm torn a bit torn on this... if the are paid by 1099-misc then they are private contractors. If they are paid by W2, then they are a true "employed" sales force. I guess I don't know where the substantial nexus line is drawn.
Is there any thing beer can't do?
while the summary is laudatory, fawning, even, it is not central to the decision
Funny, I had the same reaction when I read it. He seemed like a salesman for Google or something.
I would like to retain your services in this matter. Please list your bank account information so that I may transfer a retainer payment to you. Thank you. Sincerely, Prince Bernard Koffi Austine Nigeria
Dear Prince Bernard,
If you're talking about my bank account, you're barking up the wrong tree
So, if this stands does this mean it's lawful for Google to make the full text available of these books, or not?
Fair use cases are very fact specific. If you start monkeying with the facts, Judge Chin might not feel the same way about it.