Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Plumber (Score 1) 508

by lakeland (#47462149) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Future-Proof Jobs?

Accountant - agreed, my point was many people refer to 'accountant' where they mean bookkeeper. I do not see computers replacing good accountants - if anything it will make them more important as the better raw data gives them more ability to make a difference.

But I completely disagree on your description of what current accounting software can do. Computers are opening the post (email) for remittance advice, chasing short payments and reconciling the ledger. They flag over-payments but leave chasing them to a person - too much thought required on the communication. They also collate expense receipts and chase staff for the various tasks coded into workflow (singoff from immediate manager, tracking against budget and authorisation limit, flagging suspicious values to appropriate people, etc). Paper invoices are also handled - scan it and it's emailed off to manually assisted invoice creation (too much variation in invoices for risking automated loading). Oh, and all purchases are also directly exported to the bank where you can configure them to either just be paid or require final authorisation depending on how reliable you feel your setup is..

They already integrate with stock tracking systems and so eyes they do depreciate stock, handle damage and lost items. Stock isn't something I have firsthand experience managing, but I haven't heard any complaints. Timesheeting and payroll are also fully integrated and I know they both work well.

Current state... I see an opportunity to help someone out. I create a quote in the accounting software. I email that quote to them and if they decide to go ahead then they create a corresponding PO in their ERP system. That process automatically checks against signoff limits, obtains approval from direct manager, etc. That is then automatically emailed to me where the accounting software automatically matches it to the quote. I then deliver the work and get them to sign it off. Once that's done I click a button to convert the quote or the PO into an invoice, adjust if necessary and click send. Again now their system receives that invoice, matches it to the PO and emails my contact to validate the work was signed off as complete. Then it schedules it for payment and sends remittenance advice. That gets matched by my software which sets the invoice expected date. When the payment is made it reconciles against this invoice. If they don't pay then it automatically kicks off whatever workflow I choose to set up - friendly reminders by email with summary of outstanding and a note to me.

Sure, it's not perfect and there's still a need for bookkeepers. Someone screws up the reference code on the payment, accidentally double pays. Subcontractors who charge a different rate depending on which client they're working on, reversing out declined expense claims, client or supplier correspondence beyond simply sending out statements, etc. But compare it to say 5 years ago - I wouldn't feel very safe as a book keeper.

.

Comment: Re:Plumber (Score 4, Insightful) 508

by lakeland (#47460845) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Future-Proof Jobs?

Computers _are_ replacing accountants. Or more precisely computers are replacing bookkeepers and a lot of so called accountants are actually bookkeepers.

Most of the drudgery is leaving the profession now. What's left will be much more interesting and valuable work, but I suspect there will be a bit of a glut in lower end accountants.

Comment: Re:The press and the people... (Score 1) 228

by lakeland (#45825599) Attached to: USA Today Names Edward Snowden Tech Person of the Year

Ok, so it had a few cliches in it.

But it seems to me that the GP has a point. I'm not old enough to know what it was like during say McCarthy's witch hunts and how many people stood up for what is right. Was it a very small minority while most people just went about their lives, or was there wide public dissension? I do remember in the early 80s that there was fairly active opposition to Apartheid rather than the current defeatist apathy. That was a bit different though because most countries had abandoned it and it was more a matter of imposing our views on an unwilling minority than changing a more powerful group. The largest protest I can remember from recent history is the 99% movement and even that seemed to largely die out after a few weeks.

More succinctly: "Is the general populace's apathy to the issues of the day unique to our generation, or is this normal?"

PS: Cow towing rather than Kowtowing, though since it's from Cantonese I am not sure you could call anything a misspelling.

Comment: Re:how would it work in the real world? (Score 1) 308

by lakeland (#45654733) Attached to: Google's Plan To Kill the Corporate Network

I agree the cost of the computer is effectively a rounding error, but there are non-trivial costs in Window's favour too relating to compatibility.

It is getting a lot better with the rising popularity of Android / iOS meaning that fewer companies target a single platform, but I still find that when I try and take just my mac that I often find I have trouble doing some small thing.

Comment: Re:Why isn't all medical equipment open source? (Score 2) 134

by lakeland (#45450349) Attached to: 12-Lead Clinical ECG Design Open Sourced; Supports Tablets, Too

It's hardly fair to compare a doctor's take home pay to the median income in the US. People going to med school are both smart and hard working, try comparing the income of smart, hard-working non-doctors to doctors and I think you'll find the difference is far smaller.

Yeah, $80k after applicable deductions is a good income. Approximately 12% of Americans make that much or more.

I tried to find some data on the median income of people with similar work ethic and IQ to doctors but couldn't find anything sorry.

Comment: Re:Why do transit smartcards need to be hard? (Score 1) 96

by lakeland (#45385829) Attached to: New Zealand's Hackable Transport Card Grants Free Bus Rides

Because it is hard.

(Disclaimer: I used to work for a company which bid unsuccessfully a few years ago to fix up the Christchurch system)

Probably the hardest part is the decentralised nature. How much money do you have out there? If this card claims to have been topped up by a terminal but you have no record of that, either the terminal is slow at reporting back, or the card is lying. By the time you know, it's too late. We have no way of communicating with a card except when it happens to be brought on bus, and at that point we don't have an internet connection.

Second hardest is probably balancing trust with flexibility. We want to enable internet top-up, but how do we get the money from an authorised transaction to your card without forcing you to buy a USB to NFC adaptor? We don't want to trust the card, or at least we want to test it for hacks. We don't want to trust the terminal, a single break-in there could cost a lot. And most of all we need to be constantly worried about primary keys - a break-in to signing keys would destroy everything.

Third hardest is the cheap hardware. Customers expect to get bus cards for free, which means you can't afford more than about $5 per card. Also with a couple terminals per bus you need perhaps a thousand terminals in christchurch - many of which will only be used a few thousand times in their lifetime and so they can't be expensive either.

Fourth hardest is probably the response time. You have roughly 200ms from card presence to approve/reject. That is not enough time for complicated checking - it is enough to check the has of a card number against a blacklist, or to run a challenge response protocol, but that's about it.

That's just off the top of my head and gives a rough overview. These are largely solved problems, but I can understand why a place like Christchurch with a population of 350k, many of whom don't use PT, would elect to stick with a broken system until a national standard is rolled out.

Comment: Re:Do you work at Microsoft? (Score 2) 433

by lakeland (#42421413) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: CS Degree While Working Full Time?

Most JDs I know require a degree in a relevant field. It's used by HR as a quick filter to avoid wasting time screening out woefully underqualified people.

So what the submitter says makes some sense. If you're dealing with the person who you'll be reporting to then they'll be far more interested in relevant experience. But occasionally you have to get through HR filters too - larger companies require them for major promotions, and he might need to leave his current job if his boss gets replaced with a raving lunatic. Either way it would be very much in his interest to have enough formal education to get past the filter.

That said, I wouldn't pick CS personally. He's already a programmer and not likely to want to get into theoretical CS - there's not much demand for knowledge of asymptotic complexity in a typical programmer's job. I think a technical college or a finance / business degree would be better.

I owe the public nothing. -- J.P. Morgan

Working...