Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:virus scanners are the devil (Score 1) 472

by koro666 (#31932528) Attached to: McAfee Kills SVCHost.exe, Sets Off Reboot Loops For Win XP, Win 2000

Mod parent up. Most attacks come from the "huge attack surface" from web browser plugins these days.

I, for one, have disabled each and every Firefox add-on and unwanted plugin, and use Windows Vista/7's integrity levels to run the browser in Low Integrity. That way, the worse it can do is trash its profile directory and one designated download directory, both of which are easily wiped and re-created fresh.

Comment: Re:.h26x a stumbling point? (Score 3, Interesting) 329

by koro666 (#31150478) Attached to: Five Years of YouTube and Forced Evolution

[...] Just delegate it to the OS [...]

So next time there is some remote code execution vulnerability in DirectShow and/or its codecs, you want Firefox users to be affected too?

Face it, with the amount of "plugins" installed by default in Firefox these days in the back of the user (Acrobat, Silverlight, WPF, Windows Media Player, etc.), Firefox has become as much vulnerable as Internet Explorer, if not more because of its lack of usage of Vista's integrity levels.

Let's not add another nail to its coffin.

Computers can figure out all kinds of problems, except the things in the world that just don't add up.

Working...