Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

+ - Windows App Store reduces developer share from 70% to 56.1% for some sales.->

ConfusedVorlon writes: The Windows App Store originally offered developers a 70% revenue share (like the iTunes store and Google Play).
They have now introduced the 'Commerce Expansion Adjustment' whereby some sales are made through methods such as carrier billing and the developer will only get 56.1%.

There is no option for developers to opt out of this type of sale; Microsoft suggests that 'You may want to consider if the Commerce Expansion Adjustment applies in a country/region where your app is available and factor that into your market pricing strategy'


As a veteran of the store pricing wars on Palm OS, I have seen how this plays out. Stores competed to sell through new partners, and offered increasingly large shares of revenue to those partners. Inevitably, that came out of the developer share.

I would be very happy for Microsoft to offer me an option to make additional sales at a lower revenue share — but I'm not happy at being forced to suck it up.

Link to Original Source

Comment: Problematic (Score 1) 74 74

This type of Electronic health record keeping has been partially introduced in the Netherlands, yet not without enormous backlash. There are, amongst others, concerts about privacy and knowledge of insurance agencies. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

Comment: Re:MSFT's monolithic organization structure (Score 1) 288 288

Although I both loved the idea of the courier (details here: http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet) and understood the idea of cancelling the project, I'm not really sure I understand your reasoning. Why would a tablet, or the double-screened-courier for that matter, not fit in directly with the Windows and Office cullture?

Experiments must be reproducible; they should all fail in the same way.