Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Bad Engineering (Score 1) 443

by kleuske (#45184151) Attached to: I wish my car could...
Seriously. Most cars are overdimensioned, with toy-cars, excuse me, sports-cars as the ludicrous summum of waaaaay too much horsepowers to be of any practical use. Yet those toys are celebrated as the summum of engineering. This is not only a waste of materials and fuel, more than just loud, it's also responsable for many deaths by accidents and pollution. What use is a car that can drive 400 km/h (Bugatti Veyron, the most ludicrous car ever designed) when 130 km/h is the maximum speed? It is simply a case of "mine is bigger than yours", a dangerous, wasteful pissing match.

Comment: When can we trust computers? (Score 1) 216

by kleuske (#43091133) Attached to: When Will We Trust Robots?
In another way, this is pretty much the same question. Computers nowadays purport to serve the user, but often serve others first, either openly or covertly, by installing malware, surveilance software and botnets. There have been plenty of incidents where private data has been made available to third parties without the users consent or even knowledge. There is no reason to think this would be different when using a robot. So, apart from uncanny valley, i would need a substantial amount of trust in the manufacturer and/or operator of said robot to allow one into my house, especially if it's equipped with sound and/or video sensors.

Comment: Do not feed the trolls (Score 1) 347

by kleuske (#42781409) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What To Do About Patent Trolls Seeking Wi-fi License Fees?
Ignore them. Using this patent (IANAL, but still) they could sue anyone using the net. Even using a protocol over a (par of) UART(s) could be a reason. If they can't be ignored, hire an IP-lawyer and counter-sue for damages (reputation, legal costs, lost revenue, etc).

+ - Flame: Researchers uncover huge cyberattack->

Submitted by kleuske
kleuske (796202) writes "A complex targeted cyber-attack that collected private data from countries such as Israel and Iran has been uncovered, researchers have said.

Russian security firm Kaspersky Labs told the BBC they believed the malware, known as Flame, had been operating since August 2010.

The company said it believed the attack was state-sponsored, but could not be sure of its exact origins."

Link to Original Source

Comment: After reading that... (Score 1) 542

by kleuske (#37086136) Attached to: What's the Carbon Footprint of Bicycling?
... I wanted to kill myself, but then again, throwing myself in front of a bus isn't carbon neutral. What's the carbon-footprint of a handgun? A rope? A bridge, calulated per jumper? Aaaarrgggh.... Damned if i do and damned if i don't I guess i'll just hold my breath... (...and no, i'm _not_ being all that serious...)

+ - IPhone4 track user location->

Submitted by
kleuske writes "Two security researchers in the UK have uncovered a disturbing truth. It appears iPhone 4's everywhere have been tracking their users movements with startling accuracy (unbeknownst to the users) and what is more, the ease at which this information can be deciphered is apparently as easy to open as say, a JPEG."
Link to Original Source

The degree of technical confidence is inversely proportional to the level of management.