Judge the release of the video, and/or the cover up if there was one, all you want. Not that we have THOSE facts either, but it doesn't seem to stop anyone on here...
Have someone try to kill you every day for a year, THEN look at a grainy video while you fly through the air, and if you haven't shit your pants by then, well you *might* have the cred to start judging. Until then, STFU.
(And yes, I know Apache's have two pilots, one to fly and the other to handle the weapons. Doesn't change the point. And no, I don't support the slaughter of innocents; I was horrified to watch it unfold, but I KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON IN ADVANCE. These guys have to make a judgment unlike anything you've ever had to do.)
- Band Steering: Use dual-radio access points. The Aruba gear detects if a client supports both 2.4g and 5g, and moves the client automatically to the 5g band, which is cleaner and has more channels available.
- Spectrum Load Balancing: Every vendor offers load balancing: there are 10 users on AP-1/Channel 1, and 20 on AP-2/Channel 6, so put the next user on AP-1. This ignores the fact that the only resource you're really constrained by is the amount of spectrum in use, not the number of users on an AP. If those 10 users are using most of the spectrum of Channel 1, while Channel 6 isn't being used as heavily by the 20 users, you'll get better performance by balancing the user to the less-utilized spectrum, rather than the lowest user-count AP.
- Co-Channel Interference: The Aruba architecture knows when a client is within range of two APs on the same channel, and schedules transmissions out of the APs so they don't collide in the air.
- Adjacent channel interference: Aruba ecognizes that there *will* be some bleed between transmissions on adjacent channels, and manages transmissions to avoid that.
- Airtime Fairness: Aruba recognizes the different client phy types (802.11a, b, g, and n-2.4/n-5) and allocates certain amounts of airtime to each client, so those old 11b clients don't drag your 11n clients to a screeching halt.
- Channel Reuse: modifying the collision threshold on the channel to allow you to reuse channels in much closer proximity to one another than normally possible.
- Dynamic Multicast Optimization: The APs can detect a multicast stream and determine if it's better to send the stream to all multicast clients at one, but at the normal lowest data rate, or convert the stream to a series of unicast transmissions that can be sent to each client at a much higher rate.
- Mode-aware Adaptive Radio Management: Deploy as many APs as you want. The Aruba architecture will automatically turn on (or off!) individual radios based upon RF needs; too much RF is worse than not enough, in most cases.
- Client bandwidth contracts: Set a rate limit for each user, so one person can't use half your bandwidth.
- Policy Enforcement Firewall: Allow your users to only do what protocols you want (http, https, dhcp, dns), and block all the others. iTunes/Bonjour/MulticastDNS from Apple products will KILL your network otherwise.
If you want more information on the physics of these methods, check out this white paper which has more info than you'll want to read:
Now, all of that said, here are some BAD ideas that people have suggested:
- Use all 14 channels!
------ Not only is this illegal almost everywhere, but most clients will use the operating system's country code and only use the channels that are supposed to be available. In the U.S. for example, only channels 1-11 are valid; client devices won't try to use channels 12-14.
- Use channels 1, 4, 7, 10 on one group of APs, then 2, 5, 8, 11 on the next set....
------ TERRIBLE idea. Because 802.11a/b/g transmission are roughly 22mHz wide, you can't transmit on channel 6 without affecting channels 4, 5, 7, and 8. That model will bring the entire network to a screeching halt.
- Use the 3.6gHz band too
------ This is not spectrum that is available for your use; the AP radios can't physically use it, and neither can your clients. This one is borderline crazy...
- Set up one AP on 11b, another on 11g, another on 11n/2.4, etc.
------ Again, just silly. It ignores the fact that they will all contend for the same frequency; that's the one and only resource you don't have enough of! Putting more APs in here won't help.
In the end, you left too many questions unanswered for me to get much more specific. What country is this in? How big is the space? Why can you only use 3 spots? Where are the three spots? How many *simultaneous* users will you have? What will they try to access? What do you WANT them to access? And what's your budget for all of this?
Good luck... reach out to me or your local Aruba rep if you want more info or assistance...
"... use, copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, communicate to the public
Even stranger, a follow-on clause appears to give ANY user of the printing service the right to view and reproduce any of your photos:
"You grant to all members and other Service users permission to access, view, store, copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, display, perform, and reproduce such Materials...."
Is this just a case of boilerplate legalese being applied? Help petition CVS to change their terms of service to something that respects copyright law! Email them at email@example.com or call (888) 607-4287!"
Link to Original Source
"Cisco has provided a fix that has been applied to Duke's network and the problem has not occurred since," the company said in a written statement."
Link to Original Source