This is just me pointing out a lying bully who is deliberately misleading people.
The obvious rebuttal here is that words have meaning.
Bully: a blustering browbeating person; especially : one habitually cruel to others who are weaker
Blustering means among other things threatening. Since I have yet to be threatening in this thread, a key component of bullying is missing. Similarly, browbeating is coercion to get someone to do something. That's not happening either.
Similarly, "lying" means intentional spreading of a falsehood. You never bothered to say specifically what of what I wrote was a falsehood or why. You apparently do disagree with the observation:
This is an example. We have a bald assertion that the Hugo picks by "the puppies" were chosen on the basis of politics.
Note that no one in this thread has bothered to provide evidence or reason to dispute my observation. It's all empty assertions and noise. One can get very tired of that.
True, I won that when you refused to and continue to refuse to back up any statements you made. You've only made my argument stronger emotionally since.
Nobody cares that you think for some bizarre reason that I'm a lying bully. You give out those insults like candy and with about as much thought as breathing. There's no weight or credibility to it. And as I noted earlier, that accusation just strengthens my rhetorical position. Unfair, aggressive attacks do that for the one attacked.
You start off arguing to fail. Stop that. You need to up your game.