Why not Zoidberg?
No really, I used to use King of the Hill characters, but when it came to a server at a new host, I couldn't answer the above question, and now I have a server named zoidberg.
It is incompatible with all other websites and all other browsers - it only works with the combination of Chrome+Google's own websites.
This is flat out wrong. Just this morning I used Chrome to connect to a test server that was running a node.js implementation of SPDY. I verified the connection using chrome://net-internals. It worked well.
There is nothing in chrome that prevents this from working on other domains/websites.
There is nothing stopping anyone from implementing their own server.
End of FUD.
OS X is mostly Openstep which is mostly Nextstep which is mostly BSD 4.3 and Mach 2.5.
I don't know what you consider 'Unix' but I would say the best description of OS X is that is closer to BSD than anything else.
Just for fun sometime turn off graphical boot on an OS X machine, and watch the Regents of the University of California message scroll by
I have to assume that you are trolling, or that you haven't really used Drupal.
I've never seen anyone claim that the node system is an ORM, because it isn't. It's just a table(s) in a database, and a module that provides code to manipulate that data, but is not object oriented, nor is it mapped in anyway that resembles an ORM. The mapping to properties->columns is not even, and there is no ability to relate other nodes or objects based on the presence of another table, all of those operations are left as an exercise for the developer needing to implement it. This is why the other statement about 8 tables just to express the relationship between two objects makes no sense.