Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Depends... (Score 1) 170

by kbg (#48615769) Attached to: Verizon "End-to-End" Encrypted Calling Includes Law Enforcement Backdoor

I don't have anything against law enforcement having the ability through the court system to wire tap. What I am against is when phone companies pretend that this doesn't exists. So this is not "end-to-end" encryption, it should be called "end-to-end except as required by law" encryption

Comment: Re:Intelligence and Consciousness (Score 1) 455

by kbg (#48448005) Attached to: Alva Noe: Don't Worry About the Singularity, We Can't Even Copy an Amoeba

No it is actually very likely that machines will be sentient. You see, we are made of molecules arranged in a special way. Our body and brain is completely made out of matter. So if we could arrange molecules in a similiar way that is in our brain we would actually have created a sentient being. Consciousness is just a by-product of intelligence. If you are intelligent enough you will understand your own existence. There is no difference between Intelligence and Consciousness

Comment: AI and real intelligence are the same (Score 1) 455

by kbg (#48447961) Attached to: Alva Noe: Don't Worry About the Singularity, We Can't Even Copy an Amoeba

This professor doesn't get what artificial intelligence (AI) is. There really is no difference between AI and "real intelligence" the only difference is in size. We only call it AI because it isn't very smart yet. If we could construct a computer that would be at the size of a human brain in terms of neurological connections and had the same capacity we would actually have constructed a self aware computer.

Comment: Re:Dumb idea ... Lots of assumptions .... (Score 1) 698

by kbg (#48376571) Attached to: US School Installs 'Shooter Detection' System

The same way it is being done for drivers licenses. There are set of rules of what causes suspension of your driver license due to mental illnesses and there is a group of people who rule on a case by case basis. The same way is also being done for the courts. Somehow the courts can rule if you are sane or insane. This isn't a problem that hasn't been solved before.

Stringent background checks means less desirable people are given guns, which means fewer guns. It is all about limiting the amount of guns in circulation and having only responsible people own guns.

For example you could require by law that all gun owners keep their guns locked in a gun cabinet which the police will enforce by inspection of your home. That would limit the relatives of the gun owner of aquiring the weapons.

Comment: Re:Dumb idea ... Lots of assumptions .... (Score 1) 698

by kbg (#48376529) Attached to: US School Installs 'Shooter Detection' System

Well I would like to think that if you are classified as having severe mental problems you should not be allowed to own a gun, just like having certain mental problems can suspend your drivers license.

There are already in place regulations for mental problems for having a drivers license, so it isn't impossible to do the same for gun license.

You talk like these are some impossible problems to solve, but these are being applied every day for everything else.

Comment: Re:Dumb idea ... Lots of assumptions .... (Score 1) 698

by kbg (#48376451) Attached to: US School Installs 'Shooter Detection' System

Really? Limiting guns to sane and responsible people would not help? It wouldn't even reduce the incidents?

Why do we have drivers licenses? Why are people required to take drivers exam. I mean some people will still drive dangerously without a drivers license so why don't we just abandon all regulations for car ownership? Because it helps with reducing car accidents, it doesn't eliminate it, just like gun regulation would not eliminate gun violence but it would reduce it.

Comment: Re:Google totally fucked up Android (Score 1) 214

by kbg (#48320387) Attached to: Android 5.0 Makes SD Cards Great Again

In newest Android you can't programmatically set airplane mode so if you want to for example conserve power at night by automatically turning off mobile you can't and it keeps on draining power. For GPS it is most likely due to that most mobiles use A-GPS (Assisted GPS) which also uses cell towers communication in addition to GPS. But even so totally turning of GPS in airplane mode is stupid.

No amount of genius can overcome a preoccupation with detail.

Working...