Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Maybe not overly broad. (Score 1) 323

Non-disclosures and non-competes overlap a little, and I think in this case non-competes could apply, because they might be working for the competitor to do this. That said, they wouldn't need to work for them to give out this information, so a non-disclosure would be more appropriate. They might already sign one of these. I don't know.

Comment: Maybe not overly broad. (Score 2, Insightful) 323

As I understand it, this is saying that warehouse workers (i.e. the people who do physical labor like moving products from point A to point B, or pack shipments) can't help to develop similar systems for their competitors using what they know about Amazon's practices. This does not seem to stop them from doing manual labor elsewhere.

This doesn't seem all that concerning to me. AFAIK this is the exact kind of thing non-competes are intended for. Perhaps 18 months is a little long. I'd guess 6-12 months is more reasonable.

But other than that, this doesn't seem all that bad.

Comment: Re:"bad press", "interested in security" (Score 1) 306

by kaputtfurleben (#47647047) Attached to: New NSA-Funded Code Rolls All Programming Languages Into One
"Bad press" doesn't necessarily imply a virtuous subject being distorted, it can also imply articles that are generally interpreted as negative. Journalism is supposed to be impartial after all (though it doesn't always end up that way). And the NSA aren't "bad people with a bad agenda" because "bad" is about as subjective as it gets. They are just not moving toward the same goals that you or others are.

Comment: Re:Why is the archive worth preserving? (Score 2) 104

by kaputtfurleben (#45358945) Attached to: Internet Archive's San Francisco Home Badly Damaged By Fire

It's attitudes like yours that caused so many silent films or early episodes of Doctor Who to be lost to time.

My attitude of asking a question? I didn't say the answer was "nothing," I just wasn't sure what it was. Thankfully ibwolf gave a pretty good answer.

Comment: Why is the archive worth preserving? (Score 2) 104

by kaputtfurleben (#45357585) Attached to: Internet Archive's San Francisco Home Badly Damaged By Fire
Aside from the chuckle I get from visiting geocities pages once a decade, what reasons are there for helping to preserve it? Is the preservation of old internet sites anything more than a curiousity that will end up in museums? Is it useful to the human race in some way?
The Internet

+ - Westboro Baptists Stage Fake Anonymous Threat-> 1

Submitted by
lenwood writes "Last week there was a story on /. reporting that the hacking group Anonymous was staging an attack against WBC ( Turns out that this was a publicity stunt staged by WBC themselves. Anonymous issued a press release disassociating themselves from this."
Link to Original Source

Criminal Photoshops Himself Into Charity Photos In Bid For Leniency 108

Posted by samzenpus
from the shopping-daryl-in-a-crowded-theater dept.
38-year-old Daryl Simon decided it would be a good idea to submit fake pictures of himself at charity events, and forged letters of support from various charitable organizations to the court before he was sentenced for credit card fraud. Unfortunately for Daryl, he is as good at Photoshop as he is at credit card scams, and Judge Stephen Robinson was not amused. Simon was sentenced to 285-months in prison — 50 months more than the maximum under sentencing guidelines. From the article: "Daryl Simon's bald-faced move included sticking a picture of himself into a shot with a physical-therapy patient, then flipping the image and placing it next to a teen student. 'Evidence that his image was inserted and flipped can be seen by examining the single detail on his shirt above his fingers — that detail appears on the left side of the shirt in the top photograph, and on the right side of the shirt in the bottom photograph,' prosecutors wrote."

Comment: Using a fake name has downsides, implausibilities (Score 1) 833

There are a lot of replies about how you don't have to provide your "real" name. However, most people that already play have almost certainly used their real names to create their account(s). And once an account is created, the name on the account cannot be changed. Further, should your account ever be compromised, the only surefire way to recover it is to provide some identifying information, such as a driver's license or birth certificate. If you don't use your own name, you risk losing it to some scammer or javascript exploit, and no way to get it back because your name is not legally "I.P. Freely".

+ - NASA solar satellite flashes first Sun images->

Submitted by coondoggie
coondoggie (973519) writes "NASA today showed off the amazing first pictures of the Sun taken from its 6,800lb Solar Dynamics Observatory flying at an orbit 22,300 miles above Earth. The first images show a variety of activity NASA says provide never-before-seen detail of material streaming outward and away from sunspots. Others show extreme close-ups of activity on the sun’s surface. The spacecraft also has made the first high-resolution measurements of solar flares in a broad range of extreme ultraviolet wavelengths."
Link to Original Source

+ - Canada to Boldly Go...->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "The actor that portrayed the original Capt. James T. Kirk could be the next Canadian Governor General. Canadians all over the world could potentially hear a throne speech with Shatner's classic... sp.eaking... style.

So what do you think about Governor General William Shatner?

Of course he'll probably ask everyone to call him Bill."

Link to Original Source

I never cheated an honest man, only rascals. They wanted something for nothing. I gave them nothing for something. -- Joseph "Yellow Kid" Weil