Just change the fingerprints on all accounts and you're safe again.
That is a totally ridiculous solution and yet it seems so reasonable (I'm sure someone will say, "it is the only way to be sure.")
With impending guvmint shutdown sometimes I wonder who's minding the store? There's gotta be a "In Soviet Russia" answer to this one.
unlike Mars is always 20 years away (and has been for past 50 years!). My usual gripe of everyone from Musk to NASA to Zubrin love to talk about Mars because they can always defer building a transfer stage and lander to some other smucks 20 years into the future. Now if we talk about the Moon then gotta start building something now. Now this rover is a small mission but at least puts some focus on the nearest celestial body.
One of you posted a comment that back in 1970s and 80s NASA's plan was to build an infrastructure of LEO, stations, and lunar missions. But in later 1980s the "Mars Underground" hijacked the space policy and pushed to bypass all that and go directly to Mars. And we've been stuck in LEO ever since!
Speaking of reporting, I found this scrap in my various files of commentary from back in usenet days:
>This AP article has been making the rounds. It's rather shoddy journalism in that it takes the words of the spammers completely at face value.
I've been a journalist for over 8 years. I see a lot of misconceptions in the two lines of your post. Maybe it's the TV's fault. Maybe you've grown used to think about Dan Rather or Barbara Walters as journalists. They're not. They're celebrities. A journalist walks his beat, watches, listens and reports the facts. Just the facts.
I've interviewed murderers and rapists. I've also interviewed way more politicians than you'd ever care to meet. And when I come back to my desk and write the story, I simply report what they said. Nobody cares what I think about it; my job is to tell you what they said.
So, taking their words at face value is NOT shoddy journalism. It's real journalism. You, the reader, should decide what to make of their words.
Shoddy journalism would be to assume spammers lie, and mocking them, distorting what they said. It would be a lot more gratifying for antispammers, yes, but it would also be the worst kind of journalism: A distortion of the truth.
--- end quote ---
... they called it the Hitler Channel. No mater what series, if you could tie something to Hitler or the Nazis then it was a big plus.
Godwin's Law Channel might be a better name but doesn't roll off the tongue that well. Like the Military Channel, it's all WWII. Same footage over and over but with color added and better sound effects. Speaking of footage, all combat footage even most of Vietnam War footage is all silent. None of those cameras had sound.
Korean War is the Forgotten War, Vietnam War is still too sensitive to talk about (many people are still "fighting it"), and Iraqi 1 and 2 Wars are mysteriously locked away even considering there is tons of footage from various video sources (there is a lot of clips from camcorders and phones on youtube but all disorganized).
Next well covered war of combat footage is the Civil War, obviously much of it is re-creation.
I guarantee no phone service ever ran on the entire VHF or UHF band.
It didn't. There were specific frequencies allocated to IMTS mobile telephone service. These are in same 150-162 MHz 9and 450-470) band along with police, fire, business, etc. These channels used same bandwidth as a typical 2-way frequency (and 2-way radio has superior audio quality over cellphone). But the IMTS was full duplex (used both xmit and rec freq at same time) and there was not many frequencies available so only the stinking rich got phones in their cars (and many of them had to wait on a very long list to get subscription). See the old TV series Banachek (sp?) where George Peppard sports a car phone in his limo (motivated many techies to get their ham license and build their own car phone, usually a repeater that is phone patched). However doing full duplex with 1960s/70s electronics and industrial quality, these IMTS phones were big, heavy, and scary. Main radio is in trunk, control head was pretty good size as it had regular Model 500 handset and dial (I have one of these control heads, it has a real bell inside). Here we see a briefcase model, if you had one of these babies, then you were The Man.
One thing certain there is no way to plant malware in one of these things.
or is something like that be ancient like IMTS that operated on VHF freq. </factious>
Malware here, spyware there, all I want is a phone but now I have to worry about this.
It seems to me with all the problems and challenges this country faces, top men put war on terrorism which includes need for extensive surveillance the top priority over other issues. Even if govt were better organized in disaster relief, they still would not able help everyone (that's why it is a disaster) but would not be constantly ridiculed for poor performance. However there were some officials saw impending disaster so they forward based a lot of resources closer to Louisiana knowing the state will be calling for help once the winds die down. However, they were a minority because most were focused on terrorist attacks.
Regarding FEMA, I was talking with a emergency manager for a city, he said FEMA does not have response teams like state, county, or city OES departments. FEMA is mostly a fund provider and insurance for disasters.
Nonsense. Space is blue and birds fly through it. -- Heisenberg