Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
I understand the security rationale for making logs readable only by root but it makes working on servers adminstered by random offshore people ($5/hour, no IT abilities whatsoever) quite difficult (hey, this server is networked half-duplex and the admin doesn't know what that means. Hmm, the time is off but the admin doesn't know what ntpd is. Why is the sysadmin rebooting that Linux server repeatedly to try to solve a problem that does not require rebooting?) as you need to analyze the problem, not describe the symptoms, and it's harder without read access to the logs. The Linux assumption that someone with root should have a clue is long gone at large companies; the very first thing to go to the least knowledgeable is the root account, and it is widely shared but only to others who don't know the O/S. Note that the logs are readable on most other UNIX flavours (mostly dying flavours at this point). I'd suggest fixing the security problems with the logs or confining them to specific restricted files instead of just hiding all the logs from users. Not every Linux box is used by one guy in his basement.
RHEL no longer has a whole lot of competition in the data centre (real competition, that is, stuff that works and has a reasonable vendor). I don't really expect it to improve at this point. No pressure. Should be OK as long as it doesn't degrade too much more.
The big outsourcing companies are going offshore so that they can first bill a bunch of "cheap" but ineffective offshore people and then bill for competent onshore people to actually deliver the project once it is clear nothing will get done successfully offshore. The offshore guys are salary ballast. It's a management fad so they still get people to sign on, and even to go through the process repeatedly as long as the VPs at client companies ignore their underlings who actually see the results.
In both fields sexism tends to chase away some of the people who aren't committed to the field. Many of the women I've met in tech have been very good, a better ratio than the guys I'd say, though fewer of them.
A straight linux server running openswan can connect to almost anything but it takes a bit of doing. I haven't used it in the last few years but it worked last time I tried. Multiple NICs are helpful and considering negligible cost (if you don't have a pile, I have a drawerful around somewhere) easy to justify.
Israel was quite restrained when governed by parties that did not benefit from additional violence.
You would think lives > votes but certainly the US and Israel strongly disagree. I'd be curious how many western governments would refrain from killing citizens for votes. Certainly most of them are willing to kill their economies for campaign donations.
Also hard to distinguish the ones who do what they are supposed to do (show their grad students how to write and submit papers, introduce them to other leaders) from the ones who take credit and then dump on their juniors. The good ones have to compete with the people they graduate later, and at least some of those people will be brighter than they are.
You have to consider that even the least intelligent people with science phds and postdocs are still pretty bright. And the good ones who publish the most are normally working or schmoozing most of their waking life, far more than the innovators in most companies. Some labs are publishing factories where loads of postdocs churn out loads of papers each. The person running the lab has a significant impact.
I don't think this is a case where you just turf all these profs for putting out too many papers. The biggest issue is that there aren't enough jobs for current students so a lot of the best people burn out and leave. There is not much hope of making money before about 45 in most fields due to the number of years of study required. Outcompeting really bright people for 25 adult years and then getting stuck behind a bunch of tenured guys with dropping government funding sucks.
Do real HR in India and the industry drops by 90%. If you actually require the people you hire at $5/hour have some IT knowledge or aptitude (just one or the other, not both, that would be really optimistic) most people will have to leave the industry. Sort of like NA during the boom except clueless people would last 2 days here instead of billing clients for years.
"Hey can you do this week long project for free?"
"No, pay me."
"I'll get my offshore guy to work on it."
6 months later.
"So can you do this thing for free?"
"No. What happened to your offshore guy?"
"He's still working on it full time but he doesn't have any recoverable work completed yet. So can you do it for free?"
"Your negotiating position is not improving"
There is definitely a stratification for offshoring with good people able to get better visas and/or salaries comparable to onshore employees. The number of good people is tiny compared with the size of the offshoring industry. Most offshore workers, certainly the ones working for large companies (onshore or offshore, i.e. Infosys and IBM) are salary ballast. They can bill but they can't do productive work.
Good people get good money wherever they are in IT (and some not so good people get good money). It is not like auto-workers with no skills (8 hours training) and no mobility. Companies that are "saving money" offshore or onshore are not hiring good people. Anyone with meaningful skills, even in India (a tiny proportion of those in India working in IT) will get offers at close to western salaries. A lot of people with no meaningful skills "edit a text file? I don't have confidence I can do that" will continue to be paid peanuts to do little positive work and, in many cases, lots of damage. Same as in America in the '90s tech boom where unqualified (and incapable) people were working because of the scarcity of capable people.
Rebellion is so much easier in the absence of repression.
Next step is working out the controllers for glasses etc. See if it gets done before implants with direct brain connections are workable...