Perfect application of laws isn't the subject. Wide-spread regime-condoned discrimination of minorities is. No other nation with anything approaching their level of economic development practices Apartheid in the 21st Century as Malaysia does.
The problem then becomes, how to prevent the clever bad guy (with physical access to an AV for as much time as he needs) from fooling the AV into thinking it is carrying a person.
You have no evidence even though you are calling her guilty.
Her Majesty's behavior screams: "We sooooo guilty, but you gonna do precisely shag-all, Joe." Your crescendos of supercilious bleating aside, Her Majesty will have to get liberal with the walking-around money to buy her way out of the "liar" category. She's the modern Jezebel.
Not when you cherry-pick your way through them and pretend that your interpretation of them is The Only True Reading.
No, if you step back and admire Her Majesty's mosaic of mendacity, you've got to admit: there goes one truth-free piece of work. I can only suppose that you're a minion of the Clinton Machine, based on your complete lack of perspective.
You don't need one single party for it to be partisan.
Aw, c'mon. That's akin to saying "All Democrats are godless Commies", which I don't begin to think true.
You claim to be in favor of reading books, right?
I'm currently enjoying http://www.amazon.com/Devils-Pleasure-Palace-Critical-Subversion/dp/159403768X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1440939206&sr=1-1&keywords=the+devil's+pleasure+palace which I'll have to bump up when I finish. A fine exposition of a truly sad tale of a godless Commie sodomite infestation.
And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones