Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Cellphones

Mexico Will Shut Down 25.9 Million Cell Phones 370

Posted by timothy
from the sort-of-thing-governments-tend-to-do dept.
Several months ago, as a way to prevent the use of cellular phones in criminal activities, the government of Mexico started a program to require all phone owners to register cell phones in their own names. The registry associates each phone with the listed owner's Clave Unica de Registro de Poblacion (CURP) [CURP, in English], which is supposed to be a unique ID for every Mexican citizen. Now, as nanahuatzin writes, Yesterday the timeline to register the cell phones expired, and there are [approx 26] million cell phones yet unregistered (English translation of the Spanish original). While the procedure is simple, sending a text message with the CURP to a special number, most people do not want to register: some are wary of the uses to which the government will put the data; others did not understand or did not know the procedure. So far, only 69% have registered, most of them in the last few days, while the system to register has been oversaturated. So in an unprecedented move for any country, the Mexican government is announcing the shutdown of 25.9 million cell phone lines. Meanwhile, as a measure of protest, hundreds of people have registered their cell phones in the name of the president of Mexico, Felipe Calderon Hinojosa, to show how pointless is the registry."

Comment: Re:Hmm.. (Score 1) 1246

by jollyplex (#26924669) Attached to: Student Arrested For Classroom Texting
Well, that depends on how you define worse. AFAIK, in the US, most public schools do effectively teach their students to read and write at a basic level (which on average may be much better than in your country).

Grandparent is making a point about the purpose of mandatory school not necessarily being education (in the sense that it makes you a creative problem solver with a rich understanding of the world). This reasoning has a dash of...
http://www.cantrip.org/gatto.html
... and a hint of...
http://www.paulgraham.com/nerds.html

Comment: Re:Absolutely not! (Score 1) 474

by jollyplex (#26230909) Attached to: ACM Urges Obama To Include CS In K-12 Core
When it comes to solving problems, I've anecdotally found that many consciously select an understood, known bad approach over an unlearned, known good approach when "in the long run" the cost of learning the new approach is insignificant compared to the benefits gleaned from it.

Often, the problem lies in a short-term outlook that makes the "long run" look unbearably long: "So what if it takes me twice the time, I don't need to type something very often." Other times, they misunderstand how the new low cost of solving the problem will open up new possibilities: "Actually, I can make those changes. No problem; it won't take long."

This anti-pattern only makes sense to me when instances*badtime learntime + instances*goodtime. A short term outlook will result in you underestimating the number of instances of the problem you'll encounter. A "bird in the hand" outlook will also make you grossly overestimate learncost.

Comment: Re:One ups Yahoo & Hadoop (Score 5, Interesting) 166

by jollyplex (#25868305) Attached to: Google Sorts 1 Petabyte In 6 Hours
Exactly. It's unclear if their better time was a software engineering or algorithmic feat, though. Hadoop was able to finish sorting the 1 TB benchmark dataset in 209 s; TFA states Google pulled the same event off in 68 s. The Yahoo blog post you linked to says their compute nodes each sported 4 SATA HDDs. Note TFA mentions Google's 1 PB dataset sort used 48,000 HDDs split between 4,000 machines, or 12 HDDs to a machine. If Google used the same machines to perform their 1 TB sort, then they had 3 times as many HDDs on each compute node, and could probably pull data from storage 3 times as fast. 209 s / 68 s ~ 3.1 -- coincidence, or not? =)
Google

'Porn King' Says Google Should Block Porn Access 424

Posted by Zonk
from the i-guess-he's-thinking-of-the-children dept.
mikesd81 writes "The Register has a story saying that one of the world's biggest porn producers wants Google and other search sites to put up barriers between kids and adult entertainment. 'Steven Hirsch, the co-chairman and co-founder of Vivid Entertainment, is to deliver this message on Saturday in New Haven, Connecticut as he addresses an army of Yale University MBA candidates. "Responsible companies in the adult industry such as ours have done a great deal to deter minors from accessing adult material," Hirsch proclaims from inside a Vivid press release. "None of the search engines and portals, but particularly Yahoo and Google, has taken any significant steps in this direction.'"
Biotech

Some People Just Never Learn 327

Posted by Zonk
from the i-could-use-a-dose-of-anti-a1 dept.
Iddo Genuth writes "German scientists recently showed what many of us suspected but could not prove — some people just don't learn. The German researchers have found a genetic factor that affects our ability to learn from our errors. The scientists demonstrated that men carrying the A1 mutation are less successful at learning to avoid mistakes than men who do not carry this genetic mutation. This finding has the potential to improve our understanding of the causes of addictive and compulsive behaviors."

Human-Robot Love and Marriage 358

Posted by CowboyNeal
from the hardly-miss-hoomans-at-all dept.
An anonymous reader writes "MSNBC has an article on the impending robo-human coupling: 'My forecast is that around 2050, the state of Massachusetts will be the first jurisdiction to legalize marriages with robots,' artificial intelligence researcher David Levy at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands told LiveScience."

Robots Could Some Day Demand Legal Rights 473

Posted by Zonk
from the good-news-everyone dept.
Karrde712 writes "According to a study by the British government, as reported by the BBC, robots may some day improve to a level of intelligence where they might be able to demand rights, even 'robo-healthcare'." From the article: "The research was commissioned by the UK Office of Science and Innovation's Horizon Scanning Centre. The 246 summary papers, called the Sigma and Delta scans, were complied by futures researchers, Outsights-Ipsos Mori partnership and the US-based Institute for the Future (IFTF) ... The paper which addresses Robo-rights, titled Utopian dream or rise of the machines? examines the developments in artificial intelligence and how this may impact on law and politics." I'd better get started on my RoboAmerican studies degree.
Businesses

Can a Manager Be a Techie and Survive? 238

Posted by Zonk
from the pointy-hair-with-a-diploma dept.
theodp writes "Some say that good managers should not be technical at all. Over at Computerworld, 'C.J. Kelly' takes a contrarian position, arguing that managers should keep their hands on the technology. The ability to tell the difference between fiction and reality, says Kelly, is priceless." From the article: "If you don't know the difference between fiction and reality, you've got a problem. By being technically informed while managing people and projects, no one can blow smoke up my skirt. I can tell the difference between a lame excuse for a delay and a legitimate reason why something can't be done." Where do you fall on this issue? Is it nice to be able to flim-flam the boss once in a while? Or is the valuable input of a boss with a technical background worth the occasional all-nighter?

love, v.: I'll let you play with my life if you'll let me play with yours.

Working...