The problem is you're not in a position to be able to evaluate the evidence - climate science is difficult and specialised.
Hey, that's the same thing the guy told me who tried selling me magnets to increase my gas mileage... The science is too difficult and specialized. I should "just trust him". Thanks for explaining this to me
Right, someone else tried that argument with a guy doing a seance, but he was at least smart enough to log in first.
The crucial difference between the magnet gas mileage person and science is that the scientist could actually back up their claims - it's just difficult to explain quickly and simply to a non-scientist. Of course, if climate science were a sham like magnet man, then other scientists would be able to demonstrate it.
The fact that you think "an expert in a scientific field can't easily explain it to me" = "he's a lying scammer" demonstrates an enormous lack of understanding about how experts work.
Did you say the same thing to your heart surgeon, or the guy who wrote the Linux kernel, or the guy sequencing your genome, or the guy developing the drugs that make your quality of life better?