Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:U.S. is established on religion, so (Score 1) 900

by jmizrahi (#38509280) Attached to: America's Turn From Science, a Danger For Democracy

The whole U.S. is established on the idea of God and religion

A rather silly statement, given that if it were true, you would expect it to appear in the establishing document of the United States, namely the constitution. In actuality, the founding fathers were mostly atheists, and the government was designed in such a way to keep religion out of the picture.

For future reference, this sort of outrageous hyperbole diminishes the impact of whatever else you have to say.

Comment: Re:um... (Score 5, Informative) 61

by jmizrahi (#36804754) Attached to: Breakthrough Toward Quantum Computing
Neither statement is true. First, we have entangled many systems other than photons. We have entangled trapped ions, neutral Rydberg atoms, superconducting qubits, nuclear spin states, and the list goes on. There are advantages and disadvantages to each quantum computing architecture. One of the fundamental issues facing all quantum computing architectures is the question of scalability. It is not always clear how to go from 1 or 2 qubits to thousands or millions of qubits. Some architectures, such as trapped ions, lend themselves naturally to scaling. The significance of this work is that up to this point, it has been unclear how you might scale a photonic quantum computer. The authors of this paper have taken the first steps towards overcoming that obstacle. As to your second statement, observed photon entanglement cannot be explained via classical optics. It has been shown to violate a Bell inequality, which is the hallmark of non-classicality in quantum mechanics.

+ - Gamma Ray Bubbles Erupting From Milky Way Center->

Submitted by jmizrahi
jmizrahi (1409493) writes "A group of scientists working with data from NASA’s Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope said Tuesday that they had discovered two bubbles of energy erupting from the center of the Milky Way galaxy. The bubbles, they said at a news conference and in a paper to be published Wednesday in The Astrophysical Journal, extend 25,000 light years up and down from each side of the galaxy and contain the energy equivalent to 100,000 supernova explosions.

“They’re big,” said Doug Finkbeiner of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, leader of the team that discovered them.

The source of the bubbles is a mystery. One possibility is that they are fueled by a wave of star births and deaths at the center of the galaxy. Another option is a gigantic belch from the black hole known to reside, like Jabba the Hutt, at the center of the Milky Way. What it is apparently not is dark matter, the mysterious something that astronomers say makes up a quarter of the universe and holds galaxies together."

Link to Original Source

Comment: ridiculous summary (Score 4, Informative) 169

by jmizrahi (#33665246) Attached to: Scientists Using Lasers To Cool Molecules

This is a particularly bad science article. First of all, this research is interesting because they are laser cooling molecules. The article makes it sound like the new thing here is using lasers to cool. Laser cooling of atoms has been around for decades, but laser cooling of molecules is considerably more difficult because molecules have far more resonant transitions than do atoms (this is due to the additional rotational and vibrational degrees of freedom.) Traditional Doppler laser cooling relies on cycling transitions, in which the atoms go back and forth between two levels, losing momentum as they cycle. If the particles can "escape" to other levels, the cycle breaks and cooling stops. Traditionally, in atoms this problem is solved by having other lasers on the table which "plug up" these holes by repumping the atoms back into the cooling cycle. With molecules, there has historically been far too many holes to simply plug them with other lasers.

Second, Fahrenheit? Seriously? Nano/Micro/MilliKelvin is the appropriate unit.

Comment: Quark gluon plasma? (Score 5, Interesting) 311

by jmizrahi (#33655720) Attached to: LHC Spies Hints of Infant Universe
The article seems to say that sufficiently high energy density results in free quarks. I was under the impression that the theory of the strong nuclear force demanded that all observable particles are "colorless," i.e. quarks are never free, but only appear in colorless combinations of mesons and hadrons. Could someone more knowledgeable clarify whether this phenomenon is a violation of the "nature is colorless" law, or whether the article simply does a poor job of explaining a quark-gluon plasma?

Comment: Re:Gee, what a concept (Score 1) 233

by jmizrahi (#33511508) Attached to: Brazil Considering Legalizing File Sharing

Its only in the last 200 years or so that we have had the idea that musicians should make money for a recording of their performance.

Yes, it sure is shocking that nobody thought to sell music recordings before 1904. It's almost like the technology to record and play back music didn't even exist.

Honestly, since there is no way they are ever going to stop filesharing, its not a bad idea to legalize it IMHO.

That's a ridiculous argument, seeing as though they are never going to completely stop ANY crime.

Comment: Re:meh (Score 2, Informative) 320

by jmizrahi (#33152346) Attached to: 400 Turns of <em>Civilization V</em>
This is obviously a personal preference thing, but I had the opposite experience. I played Civ II for many years, then had a long break, and years later tried Civ IV. I found it to be better than Civ II in a lot of ways. There were all sorts of annoying things in Civ II, like losing whole stacks of units when one gets attacked, or the ability to deposit entire armies outside your opponents city and then declare war, during which you could use his railroads. Civ IV has numerous small improvements, which for me added up to make a big difference. The basic gameplay, of course, is the same.

Comment: Re:No details but interesting (Score 3, Interesting) 129

by jmizrahi (#32228996) Attached to: Quantum Entanglement and Photosynthesis

The difficulty in achieving entanglement comes from the system being perturbed at random from thermal vibrations.

That's not quite accurate. The difficulty in achieving entanglement comes from the inherent difficulty in isolating a quantum system from its environment. In the case of ion trap quantum computing, for example, this isolation is achieved through an ultra high vacuum. Ultra high vacuum has its own difficulties, but does not require cryogenics.

Privacy

On Social Networks, You Are Who You Know 171

Posted by kdawson
from the spy-with-a-little-help-from-my-friends dept.
santosh maharshi writes "On social networks like Facebook, even if you have kept your profile very private, people can just look at your friends list and infer lots of vital information about you. Most of the social networks like Facebook and LinkedIn allow people to see your picture and your friends list as part of the open access for visitors (the article says that only 5% of Facebook users have bothered to hide their friends list). In a study titled You Are Who You Know: Inferring User Profiles in Online Social Networks (PDF), conducted by Alan Mislove of Northeastern University and his colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, an algorithm was tested that can accurately infer the personal attributes of Facebook users simply by looking at their friend lists. 'At Rice [University], the algorithm accurately predicted the correct dormitory, graduation year, and area of study for the many of the students. In fact, among these undergraduates, researchers found that “with as little as 20 percent of the users providing attributes we can often infer the attributes for the remaining users with over 80 percent accuracy."'"

"Love may fail, but courtesy will previal." -- A Kurt Vonnegut fan

Working...