Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Spectrum? (Score 1) 127

by jimbolauski (#43709685) Attached to: Samsung Testing 5G Phones With 1gbps Download Speed

Don't know they are not doing this already too but seems you could go asymmetric. The handsets could send to the tower with 64QAM and the tower could use more radiated power to send 256QAM back to the handset.

Phones are no longer symmetric data entities it probably is the case most smart phone users pull down much more than they send now. Of course you can crank the radiated power from the towers up to much or you are just going to start competing with the neighboring cells more. So I don't know how big the gains would be.

Yes you can do some of that but even broadcasting from a tower at higher power levels will not fix issues. Multipath it one issue that will not go away with more power, if you are standing next to a metal building your phone will get two signals the direct one and the signal that bounces off the metal wall at 256QAM the modulation could easily get washed out by the reflected signal. A SNR of 30dB is needed for 256QAM there are many areas that fall short of that requirement.

Comment: Re:A $15 dollar SD car gives me more. (Score 1) 455

by jimbolauski (#43645779) Attached to: Why Your New Car's Technology Is Four Years Old

Fuel injection predates electronics. Traction control and abs are fripperies, they don't defeat the laws of physics. Rear defroster is electrical, not electronic. Unplugging and replacing a sensor is simple, obtaining a sensor may be impossible.

Yes atomized fuel sprayers did exist, but not the modern fuel injection systems that can optimize fuel and air ratios and get the efficiency and power gains. In 30 years getting sensors may be difficult but so will getting any part. Rear defrosters are electronic, do you think they shut off by themselves magically?

Comment: Re:A $15 dollar SD car gives me more. (Score 1) 455

by jimbolauski (#43643363) Attached to: Why Your New Car's Technology Is Four Years Old

Honestly, if they can't keep up they shouldn't even pretend. I'm sick of cars that have overworked electronics that are just waiting to fail. I don't want my car to be a computer.

I'd like to see a car maker have the courage to go in the opposite direction - simpler engineering that's easier and more affordable to maintain over the life of a vehicle.

Back in the 50's and 60's it was much easier for a kid to pop the hood and learn to tear down and rebuild an engine. Now it requires specialized tools. You don't see as many self taught gearheads.

All the efficiency and emissions improvements are brought to you by electronics. Do you want things like fuel injection and pick up 10-20% horse power and efficiency because each cylinder gets exactly the correct fuel air mixture as compared to a carburetor? How about traction control and abs? Rear Defroster? There are 1000's of improvements that electronics made to cars that you are overlooking. Further the electronics in the car make many things easier to replace, sensors can tell we which spark-plug to replace or if any of the sensors are acting up, unplugging and replacing a sensor is not that difficult.

Comment: Re:NRA sedition^H^H^H patriotism (Score 2) 572

by jimbolauski (#43640681) Attached to: "Terrorist" Lyrics Land High Schooler In Jail

A guy with a rifle is not a threat to any modern Army. What they fear are roadside bombs, IEDs, and similar devices.

If a guy with a rifle is not a threat, then why are soldiers eissued rifles. Further why is/are democrats so worried about "domestic terrorists" (white guys) with military style weapons? You don't have to be able to conquer an army to be a threat (Just ask Lincoln, Kennedy, King, ...)

Comment: Re:The GSU Raid and the Unnamed Politician (Score 0) 194

by jimbolauski (#43612673) Attached to: Interview: Ask John McAfee What You Will
You should never talk to the police or comment on an ongoing case, there is no benefit for doing so. Even when you are completely innocent you can still risk incriminating your self. Here is a link to a 40 minute video on why is it never in you benifit to talk to police.
Don't Talk to the police.

Comment: Re:I won't be buying one... (Score 1) 632

by jimbolauski (#43610505) Attached to: New Smart Gun Company Hopes To Begin Production This Summer

It would fail any military acceptance test which requires the weapon to be burred in sand, drug through water and mud and fired immediately after that.

Hold on a minute. Since when could you drag an M16 through mud and expect it to fire? Last I checked those things were notoriously picky, requiring exhaustive maintenance after not all that many rounds fired (and even without firing rounds at all). The reason the AK-47 is preferred around the world is its ability to tolerate much harsher conditions and still function. The M16 has an accuracy requirement far higher than the AK-47, making it a much more finicky beast.

I suspect the maintenance a Marine is trained to perform would be more than sufficient to keep an electronic fingerprint system operational.

Your typical policeman... not so much.

There are a lot of ignorance in this so I'll try to correct it all, yes M16's and all military firearms are put through a battery of tests before they are accepted those tests include a grit test which the M16 has been reported to do better then the M14, those tests are not made public so I can't cite them. As for maintenance keeping an electronic fingerprint reader operational, do you expect the marine to do a field service on the gun while taking fire because the reader got some dirt on it?

Comment: Re:Do what they do to hourly workers. (Score 1) 381

It is not against the law for employers to require employees to buy their uniforms, no need to get worked up, unless deducting the cost of the uniforms causes the employee's wages to go below minimum wage it is perfectly legal to do so. It's basically just the employer saying I'll pay you $10/hour and supply you uniforms or $11 and hour and deduct $40 from your paycheck for the expenses.

Comment: Re:Do what they do to hourly workers. (Score 1) 381

Uniforms. If an employer requires that an employee wear a uniform, the employer must pay the cost of the uniform.

This is absolutely false. Essentially deducting the cost of uniforms can not cause the person to fall below minimum wage, that is the only requirement. They can choose to pay someone $10/hour and buy the uniforms for the employee or pay them 11$ and hour and require the employee to buy them themselves.

Uniforms and Their Maintenance Under the Fair Labor Standards Act

In response to many inquiries, the Wage and Hour Division has prepared the following statement which contains the answers to the most frequently asked questions about uniform procurement and maintenance under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

(1) (Q) When is an employer required to furnish an employee with a uniform? (A) The FLSA does not require that employees wear uniforms. However, if the wearing of a uniform is required by some other law, the nature of a business, or by an employer, the cost of the uniform is considered to be a business expense of the employer. If the employer requires the employee to bear the cost, it may not reduce the employee's wage below the minimum wage or cut into overtime compensation required by the Act. For example, if an employee who is subject to the statutory minimum wage of $3.35 an hour is paid $3.50 an hour and works 45 hours in the workweek, $6.00 is the maximum amount the employer can legally deduct from the employee's wages and still satisfy the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Act ($3.50 - $3.35 = $.15; $.15 x 40 hours = $6.00). If the same employee works 30 hours in the workweek, $4.50 is the maximum amount the employer can legally deduct from the employee's wages ($.15 x 30 hours)...

Comment: Re:How about gloves? (Score 1) 632

by jimbolauski (#43585003) Attached to: New Smart Gun Company Hopes To Begin Production This Summer

I am aware that ~20k were suicides, and think this does apply to suicides as well as homicides, as the person committing suicide is not necessarily the authorized user of the gun.

So because you can't differentiate between people that kill themselves with their gun as opposed to people killing them selves with a gun they are not authorized to use the gun it's OK to keep them all. Around 2,000 suicides are carried out by minors with a gun, those are the only ones you can say for sure are not authorized to use a gun.

Comment: Re:I won't be buying one... (Score 1) 632

by jimbolauski (#43584801) Attached to: New Smart Gun Company Hopes To Begin Production This Summer

Why does it have to be so reliable? The firing range isn't running anywhere. This is a civilian technology, I don't think it will be used in the military.

If all you intend to use the gun for is in the firing range then yes you are correct, if the gun is used for sport shooting, hunting, or self defense then a gun with false negatives is not a desired feature.

Comment: Re:I won't be buying one... (Score 3, Insightful) 632

by jimbolauski (#43584681) Attached to: New Smart Gun Company Hopes To Begin Production This Summer

Do you have an emotional response to firearms that makes thinking difficult for you?

Nope, but the statistic is misleading. My consumer SCSI HD has a MTBF of 5 years (and my last drive lasted 10 years of 24/7 use before the drive started to even whine a bit). How many times does the read/write arm - which is basically a lever and spring - move during that time? Probably hundreds of millions.

Guns are just simple mechanical machines. There's nothing magical about their parts, which will function in relation to the quality of their design and maintenance as well as their usage situations - like most things.

So how is your quote "You fire "millions" of rounds from a single weapon?" any more relevant. An electronic finger print reader will not verify a print with something as simple as a smudge over the sensor or the shooter wearing gloves. It would fail any military acceptance test which requires the weapon to be burred in sand, drug through water and mud and fired immediately after that.

Comment: Re:that's how a 15 years old teenager (Score 1, Offtopic) 342

by jimbolauski (#43580845) Attached to: Lawyer Loses It In Letter To Patent Office

Oh, let's not stop at gender! Anyone who doesn't specify they're child's race mix, body type, astrological sign, and major areas of academic and extracurricular focus in _every_ conversation is treating their child as nothing more than a lump of protoplasm!

You forgot the most important DNA sequence.

Dead? No excuse for laying off work.

Working...