Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:it was sickening (Score 3, Insightful) 319

by jez9999 (#43922565) Attached to: Japan's Radiation Disaster Toll: None Dead, None Sick

Nuclear sucks

How so?

it has security issues

Not really with integral fast reactors; it's too hard to get at the nuclear material without being killed by the radiation.

(although it could also safely and usefully dispose of all the Uranium 235 in the world, an angle I rarely hear anyone mention)

Quite.

and it's not renewable.

Nor is virtually anything. Solar power is using up the sun's energy. But, like solar, we do have an extremely large supply of fuel for it that would last us many thousands of years at the bare minimum.

So I'm still not really seeing any justification for your "it sucks" angle.

Comment: Re:24 yo? (Score 2) 429

by jez9999 (#43746517) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Dealing With a Fear of Technological Change?

I just spent 3 days at a HP-sponsored event. Can you say Windows? I happened to mention I use Emacs as my editor. Everything was fine up until then, using Linux is "geeky/cool," but for a couple of listeners, using Emacs equated with being ancient. Bizarre.

To be fair, at least Windows has a decent text editor.

Comment: Re:Nothing new (Score 1, Interesting) 202

by jez9999 (#43607647) Attached to: Oslo Needs Your Garbage

You're much better off reusing/recycling whatever you can

Debatable. See this Penn & Teller Bullshit! episode, and consider how much empirical evidence you've actually seen that recycling is always best for the environment or whether, in many cases, it would actually be better to landfill stuff and create new stuff from scratch, especially things like glass where we have an effectively infinite supply of sand to create new glass with.

One of the most overlooked advantages to computers is... If they do foul up, there's no law against whacking them around a little. -- Joe Martin

Working...