Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Image

The 10 Most Absurd Scientific Papers 127

Posted by samzenpus
from the burning-potential-of-fire dept.
Lanxon writes "It's true: 'Effects of cocaine on honeybee dance behavior,' 'Fellatio by fruit bats prolongs copulation time,' and 'Are full or empty beer bottles sturdier and does their fracture-threshold suffice to break the human skull?' are all genuine scientific research papers, and all were genuinely published in journals or similar publications. Wired's presentation of a collection of the most bizarrely-named research papers contains seven other gems, including one about naval fluff and another published in The Journal of Sex Research."

Comment: Technical questions in interviewing: yes, but... (Score 1) 440

by j.leidner (#29328243) Attached to: Appropriate Interviewing For a Worldwide Search?
It's a good idea to ask technical question to probe an applicant's knowledge, however it can be alienating if done wrongly (and I know a few companies who pursue it in a way that is unproductive). What I prefer is to ask applicants in what areas they are most proficient, and then zoom in to find out what they know in the areas. It should not be question-answer style but rather a casual conversation, where you make it clean why you ask what you ask and ideally let the candidate know why the question is relevant to the job he or she is applying for. That way, the applicant gets something back, namely feedback to what degree he or she covers the skills required. While I agree with previous posters that analytical problem solving skills (and also social skills like team ability and communications skills) are ultimately more important than knowledge, I do believe that there are minimal standards that everybody who has reached a certain level of education should accommodate. When you want to hire a developer for a new operating system and they can't name you a few different scheduling algorithms and their main property, those candidates would be ill-advised for hiring. However, don't ask them things that an experienced developer would look up on the Web anyway.

Comment: Re:It's pretty simple (Score 1) 155

by j.leidner (#28315501) Attached to: SAP — Open Source Friend Or Foe ?
Please avoid ad-hominem attacks, that's not fair regardless of your opinion.

When you buy SAP, you actually get the full ABAP source code of all the business logic, which is more openness than can be said for most businesses. Having said this it's not the same as open sourcing the software, as you need a commercial license to legally execute it.

Comment: SAP and Windows (Score 2, Insightful) 155

by j.leidner (#28315465) Attached to: SAP — Open Source Friend Or Foe ?
> Some products were Windows only for a very long time, and the GUI still is for the most part. The Java GUI is multi-platform, but still missing stuff.

That's not quite the right perspective: it actually started out from a cross-platform position. When R/3 came out, it supported 15 platforms (e.g. most Unices), and only later did it become more and more Windows-dependent. Part of this was the desire to integrate SAP's R/3 GUI more closely with Microsoft Office.

I was with the SAP basis technology group at the time.

Comment: Re:While there may be "newer" languages (Score 1) 794

by j.leidner (#28302589) Attached to: Should Undergraduates Be Taught Fortran?
> The plus of teaching Python is that it's a badass OOP language with clean and simple syntax.

Not really. Last time I checked, client code using a class could modify local fields of all its instances, thus violating the tenet of encapsulation. You also have to explicitly pass "self" by hand each time.

See Section 10 of this reference, for instance.

Comment: As long as it's FORTRAN 95 - Okay. (Score 1) 794

by j.leidner (#28296789) Attached to: Should Undergraduates Be Taught Fortran?
I agree. Why teach them Python which is slow and doesn't have the libaries that FORTRAN 95 has?

Modern versions of FORTRAN don't have the odd reliance on source code formatting anymore that come from the punchcard era (although ironically Python relies on identation now).

I've taught graduate students FORTRAN 90 and they could pretty quickly implement matrix calculations, use imaginary numbers and I/O to solve the kind of problems they need to solve, often without prior programming experience. Science and engineering computations often require vast numerical throughput, and FORTRAN compilers are unrivalled at that (and have the best optimizers and parallelization support).

I'm not saying Python can't do the same, but change for change's sake is a pretty poor argument, and the existing huge FORTRAN libaries and code bases mean FORTRAN users truly stand on the shoulder of giants.

Communications

+ - Sharks don't need sex to reproduce

Submitted by
j.leidner
j.leidner writes "According to researcher from Ireland and the U.S., sharks don't need sex for reproduction. A lady shark in a zoo that provably had no sex produced a baby shark with "no paternal DNA" using a process known as "Parthenogenesis", the process that "occurs when an egg cell is triggered to develop as an embryo without the addition of any genetic material from a male sperm cell." The experiment publicized only today, was reportedly carried out in 2001, which raises the question of the academic reviewers didn't believe the findings for quite some time, or have secretly carried out their own experiments... Since Slashdot curiously doesn't have (need?) a "sex" category, I tag this message "Communications"..."

Live within your income, even if you have to borrow to do so. -- Josh Billings

Working...