I spent several years looking for an alternative to GTK for C programming (not C++) and eventually found the xforms toolkit:
I do most all of my programming in C and mostly use ncurses but now for the occasions that I really want a gui I use the xforms toolkit.
It's similar to ncurses in that it hasn't changed significantly in many years, isn't likely to, and isn't going anywhere. It has an old-school X11/CDE look, but that suits me fine since I'm an old-school programmer.
I can recompile something that I wrote five or ten or twenty years ago with ncurses and it still works fine. Can't say the same for gtk, but now I can do that with xforms. So I'm very happy with xforms.
If you want long term stability in a gui widget toolkit, there's your answer.
Hi again. Looks like youâ(TM)re still using an ad blocker. Please turn it off in order to continue into Forbesâ(TM) ad-light experience.
I guess it's not ad-light then.
Oh well, I didn't need to read that after all.
I question whether an edited witness statement should be admissible as evidence of anything.
"Johnny said that he wouldn't kill me."
"Johnny said that he would kill me."
It's just a tiny edit....
If it's an old "Everlast" type metal holder, it very likely has a bracket screwed to the wall behind it that the holder slides onto. To remove the holder, you should lift it straight up the wall and that will unclip it from the bracket.
only to get all of them turned down but the last one.
Of course you get them turned down except for the last one. When it's accepted, you stop sending it out to publishers!
"I always find stuff in the last place that I look." Right, because when you find it you stop looking.
Do they load the box and send it back to you when you're moving to another service or returning to self-hosting?
I use mutt to read my email when I'm checking it with my phone. (Log in to a command line with VX Connectbot, then run mutt there.)
Even though it takes two steps (log in, then run the program) it's still more efficient than K9 Mail.
I know I know.. nobody reads the article. But here's the link:
I never realized that Windows uses a unix-like file hierarchy.
According to the article, drive C: is actually a symbolic link to \Device\HarddiskVolume4, COM3 is \Device\Serial0 and so on.
I'm surprised, frankly. My exposure to Windows is pretty much nil (and I like it that way) but I always assumed that the the C: drive and COM: stuff was a completely different way of accessing the devices and whatnot than what Unix uses. Apparently, it's actually quite similar once you get under the hood.
Learn something new every day....
Yer damn tootin', toots!
I have an Android tablet that I got as a "refurb" from Staples (Hipstreet brand, actually) for the sole purpose of reading sheet music pdf's on. It's ok for some quick lets-try-this-out stuff, but for anything that I'm going to do any in-depth study with, I still print the score on paper.
I don't give a rat's rear about cameras and whatnot -- give me a big screen that I can display a full size pdf sheet on and I'm interested.
Movies have a Script Supervisor whose job is to keep track of things like that. Since most movies are not shot in chronological order, in many locations and over the course of several weeks or months or sometimes even years, this is a bigger challenge than it appears at first glance.
The invention of the digital still camera was a godsend for these folks; they used to go through ungodly quantities of Polaroid film. Now they can keep it all on their computer.
I never (ever) use the number pad.
I learned to type on an Underwood office typewriter in Typing Class in school, and I learned to type numbers by entering machine language programs out of Run magazine on my Commodore 64 (using their MLX program). No number pad on a C64, so I never got used to using one.
Today, I never touch the number pad on my computer keyboard. Ever. If it was missing I wouldn't notice at all. Could use the extra desk space for something else, even.
The person who's taking you to lunch has no intention of paying.