That would make sense. This however, stinks of lobbyist action.
Perhaps when it comes to simple ball handling and player-on-player action, that's true. However, like all team sports, strategy can be applied with respect to general placement of players, passing and the like. Ideally, these strategies should leverage each player's individual strengths, thus making them unique to a given team. Opposing teams could extract much of this strategy from existing game footage, but not newly developed strategies (such as those designed to counter a specific opposing team) or tactics that are being kept 'up their sleeve' to be used in a pinch.
"An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind."
Which makes it all the stranger. High-profile area of research, likely to be checked, major journal... It's like a checklist of ways to get caught. The tinfoil hat region of my brain makes me wonder if the research is genuine, but other researchers are refuting it out of fear that the funding for their own research will be cut. After all, who needs an expensive, complex (and patented) method of creating stem cells when a cheap and easy solution produces similar (or superior) results?
That came to mind for me. The "display" they appear to be demonstrating uses a projector to illuminate desired areas of nanoparticles. The new technology here is that the particles respond to a specific bandwidth of light, letting others through. If one had a bright light of that specific bandwidth (say, a deliberately de-focused laser), he/she could illuminate the screen from another location, blinding the driver if the screen covered a large enough area of the windshield.
Putting aside the ranking of Jobs' achievements, convincing the world of the non-PCness of Macs pales in comparison to Gates' achievement: Convincing the world that all PCs run Windows.
In all seriousness, I was thinking the exact same thing.
As others here have pointed out, the premise of a BIOS-flashing piece of malware seems tenuous, and even laughable to those familiar with the subject. So why would the NSA make such a claim? One strong possibility in my mind is that they really have produced such a piece of malware (keylogger, packet sniffer, whatever) and are afraid of the public backlash and/or damage claims (my motherboard failed! it must be the NSA!) that would arise when its existence is made clear by a Snowden release. As such, they are desperately trying to spin it off on China before said release can be made.
I've been using Kensington trackballs since the early '90s. I actually prefer the old mechanical Turbo Mouse line over the current optical Expert Mouse design. The Turbo's large stainless steel rollers didn't collect nearly as much gunk as the little plastic beads in the Expert Mouse.
While I generally agree with your statements, the article is discussing the authorities' abuse of power. Pointing to the victim's lack of preparation for such abuse as some form of wrong-doing in the context of discussing the abuse itself is pretty solidly an ad hominem attack.
Provided they settle on a deuterium/tritium fuel mix, yes.
The trouble is that the greatest damage done by rape is often a matter of emotional trauma. As people grow and develop at different paces (physically, intellectually and emotionally), one can't point to a particular age and claim adulthood once it has been exceeded. There may be individuals capable of making a sound decision and coping with the results at age 12, and those that can't at age 35. Thus, the "age of consent" laws may seem rather contrived at times.
So bother to read the article
Where is that? Which of the two articles, and in what paragraph? I see no reference to gas turbines what so ever. In fact, the WSJ article has quoted the deceased's post that he was "breaking in some new packs i just got", referring to LiPo main battery packs.
That's interesting. I wonder if it has something to do with CA air quality regulations or perhaps economic demographic? I have seen a grand total of two turbine engines at our club's airfield (very likely the location of the DE event mentioned in the article), one of which was in a heli (at said event no less).
As much a tragedy as it was, he was asking for it. None of the heli fliers in our club (likely the one that hosted the DE event mentioned in the article) take those sorts of risks with personal safety. Risk the heli? Sure... You need to push yourself in order to improve, and it gives the crowd a thrill. However, the thrills and entertainment come to a screeching halt when someone gets hurt.
My best guess is this kid was a budding adrenaline junky, and got his jollies by putting himself in harm's way. Unfortunately, it seems the overstepping of his limits overlapped with his adrenaline habit.
They weigh roughly 10-12lbs, this one was a gas turbine, so it likely weighed a little more
I highly doubt that. Gas turbine engines are very rare in the RC hobby, and quite expensive. The cost of such an engine would exceed the media's quoted price tag of the entire helicopter. Given the expense and typical time invested by the hobbyist, gas turbine helis almost never see 3D flight (acrobatic flight, as the articles describe).
The most common power system in modern high performance helis is the brushless electric motor, powered by a high-discharge rate 6-10 cell lithium polymer battery pack (30-40 VDC and up to around 300 A). After that, it's 2-stroke piston engines running on glow/nitro fuel (a mixture of methanol, nitromethane and lubricating oil).