Who said anything about "pass legislation"? That was quite a leap from "what can we do to encourage social interaction" to "gubment bad"!

Hey, before you spout off more bullshit, let me post this for third time in this thread...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rights

The government, or society as I like to call it, can codify any legal right the society deems appropriate. You may not agree, but that's the way a democracy works.

Like we enslave judges, cops, and attorneys to provide the right to a fair trail, protection from criminals, and compentent defense in said trial?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rights

Society can make up any "right" they want.

There's a wiki for that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rights

I think you are saying science assumes we live in an ordered world. This happens because of this. Religion must also assume this. Although circular, science has also shown great evidence we live in an ordered world. Me typing this and hoping you will read it depends on the belief in an ordered world (and that you read replies).

So does that mean you think those without your faith are incapable or forgiving those who wrong them? Is forgivness exclusive to your faith? Did your faith include this theory becuase the leader said so? Is that better than someone who rationally applies reason to come to the idea that forgiveness is the best thing to do? Are either better than those who took faith in the studies that show you can be healthier if you forgive? Your statement has no meaning.

MOD UP!!!!

You asshat. Let me comment that article:

Oh and just in case you try to say it isn't skewed, let me quote another section:

Yeah, that "objective" data is really impressive.

That was my thought... just now, after 15 years, and it was blatent; not just refusal to the consumer/patient, but to the regulators. Not to mention it had nothing to do with the security portion of the bill. The security issues worry me much more than some doctor holding records hostage.

Yep... here it is.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/earth/earthquake-detection.html

You should check out Nova Science Now on PBS. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/

They had a segment on this last night. I am sure they have an article about it, but what would /. be without indirect sources?

Did you really compare the Inquisition to the A-bomb? You think one of the greatest scientific discoveries (the taming and designed use of nuclear power) is as horrible as a religion killing thousands and thousands for no reason other than "they don't believe what we do"?

Yes, and less of both than you, for sure.

The "White House", I suppose meaning some members of or an official position of the Obama administration, can want whatever the fuck it wants. I don't agree with the extension, but what the GP meant was he wants the guys in Congress, with the power to pass laws and change the direction of the country, to fucking do so!

So no, your quip doesn't mean a thing. It doesn't mean Democrats are sitting on their ass not improving the situation. It means they had a position on a subject, and that's about it.

Go post it on FoxNews and you'll probably get a ton of "likes" or whatever their comment system uses.

It's never an official policy... usually peer-pressure is the driving force behind the culture of "OMG, you work for Rockstar and bought a Monster!!11".

Did you guys see that! He pointed out two micro-brews in a single post and called American lagers urine! This guy is one original and interesting fellow! He also adds much to the discussion!