Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Prep for the CompTIA A+ certification exam. Save 95% on the CompTIA IT Certification Bundle ×

Comment Re:Trading one set of problems for another (Score 1) 808

If there were children, I would have a life insurance for if they are young. If they are older, they would have to fend for themselves and I hope that they have the same attitude as Ãmy sister and myself have towards our parents:
We both hope there is nothing left when they die. If anything, there could be a lot of debt, so we can denounce the inheritance. That way we were sure that they lived their lives to the fullest.

And the muliple residences: I would rent short term. Think appart-hotel. That way you have hotel service without the worries of staffing and if you leave, it is not your problem anymore.

I would live e.g. 3 months in one city in a apprt-hotel and then leave for the next one if I want to or stay longer.

Sure, more expensive than buying a house, but if I have enough, why not?

Having a car in each place? Rent them. If you want a new one, rent a new one. If you look beyond Herz and Avis, prices can be very reasonable. Sure, don't rent a Rolls ...

The issue that you have is that you want to own things for whatever reason. I do not want to own anything. OK, the clothes that I wear, but that is about it. Some clothes that fit into a suitcase a wallet with some credit cards and I would be set.

No ownership, no long term rent, no binding with anything.

Comment Re:Trading one set of problems for another (Score 1) 808

If I would have a LOT of money and I am talking e.g. Euromillions with a win of 15.000.000EUR Taxes would not be an issue.

So what if I have to pay taxes on the generated income of that 15.000.000. It becomes only a problem if you want to keep or increase the amount fo money you have.

You fill out the form and that's it. See? No problem. I would not even move to a tax haven. At least not because of paying less taxes. Income from 15.000.000 would be say 5% per year. (Low risk stuff. No need to go high risk). Of that 5% say I have to pay 50% (High number) so I get 2.5% net. That is 375000 per year and that is if you do not want to get your amount to get less.

If I would take an extra bit out of it to get to 500.000, I am living an extremely good life till the day I die and when I die all will be almost gone. Good.

See, no problems with the taxes, unless I want somehow to pay less. Only then do I need to go looking for loopholes, hire an accountant, follow my income and outgoing stuff to the T and in general do what other would be called 'working'.

No thanks. I would rent and lease as much as possible. No need to own a house that you need to buy and sell when you are bored with the location. Rent in an appart-hotel and move when you feel like it.

Want to live in NYC for a month or two? Move to Sydney for a few months? South Africa? Do a 6 months trip? All easy without owning a lot and you have a spendible amount of 500.000 per year. That is 40.000 per month or almost 10.000 per week. And all that without the issue of bothering about taxes.

Comment Re:For starters... (Score 1) 808

I agree, except for the "taking care of" part. I would not give qnybody qny money. Luckily I do not have family or friends in need of money and as I live in Europe, that would not happen, unless they are stupid and do stupid things.

If they spend more than they get in, then me giving monies will just enhance that and make the hole deeper and harder to get out of. If they signed for na house they can't afford, then that is not my problem.

And living in Europe, it is highly unpossible that it would be due to medical reasons. My mom gets cancer treatment for free. My sister received it fro free.

And for the rest: travel. Driving around the world by car. No need to take a plane to get you from London to Capetown in 1 day if you can drive it in 1 year or more.

Do something like Gunter Holtorf and that you can make as cheap or expensive as your budget allows. Interested in more? Look up 'overlanding'.

Now if you want to burn money fast, you can always buy a boat.

Comment Re:Because we are distracted by "global warming" (Score 1) 141

Please never drive a car, because you clearly can not focus on cars coming from two directions on a crossroad.

If a car example is not clear enough:
Like most issues, this is not OR/OR this is AND/AND.

So not 'Instead'. That is your major flaw. There is no 'instead'. Take a step back and you see that it is BOTH the same issue: polution.

Comment Re:So it's not unlimited, then... (Score 1) 307

The thing with capping data is that if you say 5GB, it will be very hard for them to increase that if the market changes. At least not for the same price.

Where I live one provide says it will start monitoring when you use more than 2.5 times the average. The clear disadvantage is that you have no idea how much that is. The advantage is that your maximum download will grow with the market average.

If they would lake it public what the limit is, it would be great. Unfortunately they look ate nodes (I think) so if you live near students; your li,it will be much higher tha when you live next to old people.

The thing however is if they call it unlimited and that is not what it is. Imagine that they sell you a 1TB up and down data li,ut, but they start blocking when you reach 250MB for whatever reason. You would not be happy either.

It is amazing how they keep getting away with lying. What should happen is:
1) Information to all the customers what their current new standard is
2) Free cancelation if the customer so wishes AND unlocking of the phone for free.
3) Right to new subscriptions (no: only for new customers) if the customer so wishes
4) Money back to all who did NOT get the letter, so to those who either quit by themselves or were trown out.

I understand that situations change and sometimes this means you want to drop current customers.The above would still mean you have the option to do so, but it will cost you, so the next time you will think twice.

I understand this is a very socialist point of view, looking after the customers interest and not after the companies interest, so the chance of this happening is very limited.

Comment If there is a doubt ... (Score 1) 68

If there is a doubt if it is legal, assume it isn't legal. And approach it that way.

The standard is NOT to collect information, unless so if any OTHER data is collected, it is illegal to do so.

Just follow the idea of what the law was intended for and it becomes clear. When in doubt, do NOT collect the data.

Comment Re:Aha! (Score 3, Insightful) 449

It is all supply and demand. If a women wants to get an affair, she goes to a pub and she can get laid. Not so much for a man. The ugly fat girl can still be not interested in sex (at that moment).

And the ugly fat girl can still get laid if she wants to. Not so much for the ugly fat boy.

Now if you want a relationship, it is almost the other way around.

Many years ago I knew a person who owned a dating agency. There were so many women and so few man he often pretended to be a potential candidate. This was not for a fling, but for a relationship.

Women at that time were much more willing to look for a relationship that way. This was all before the Internet.

It is a bit of a standard that men want to have sex and women want to have a relationship. Yes, there are plenty of exceptions.

Comment Re:It's the interface, stupid (Score 2) 417

We do not need Apple for this. What we need is an interface that is porgrammable that can do all of this and do it regardless of Apple or Samsung.

It already excists.It is a notepad. All the car company needs to do is add Bluetooth in the car and a way to place your notepad or phone or Ipad anywhere.

The Bluetiith can connect with the car data via the obdII port. The data is already available.

That way you just mount your device so it has power and do whatever you desire.

And then you let the software makers fight out what they think is great for that device. just an example There are many more and these are people doing it.

Do a bit of a search and you will find many more. And software IS available.

Comment Re:Black and White (Score 1) 137

Good - Looking up contentious fact being discussed.

I completely and utterly disagree. 99.9% of the discussions in a social environment are NOT about the facts. They are about the interaction between the people.

They are not debates. They are discussions. e.g. a discussion where one person says Linus says he is American and the other says he is Swedish.

Look it up and you find the truth. Discussion over. You have time to look at your phone.

Without the phone: you discuss, then get onto the subject of change of nationality. Next the subject of borders in general and that leads to the game and gaming and that leads to ordering another round and ...
In the end you had a great evening with friends. You still have no idea what Nationality Linus had or if you were even talking about the same Linus, but that is irrelevant. Talking to others is what was important.

Comment Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. (Score 1) 137

People are a social animal. Being occupied with the phone feeds into that need to be social. The same with Faceplant and what not. (and even this site.)

The person with you is already in your herd, so no need to pay attention to it. The person on the phone is not and you want him to be, so a higher need to contact him is needed.

Only when there is a risk of people leaving the heard (i.e. tell you that they will leave) will the urge move from not interested o interested.

At least that is what I think why this happens and why e.g. Faceplant has such a great success, regardless of the damage they are doing.

"Is it really you, Fuzz, or is it Memorex, or is it radiation sickness?" -- Sonic Disruptors comics