Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:ThinkPads (Score 1) 708

by hol (#37830450) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: GNU/Linux Laptops?

T420, gen 2 i5 processor, base model except for the high res screen. It's fast, quiet, and has long battery life. And it can be found for under $800 with 4 GB of RAM and a pretty fast 320 gb hdd.

Running Ubuntu 11.04 and now 11.10 on it, no issues at all. Battery life on the stock kernels is about 4 hours for just typing and surfing.

The version of X that shipped with 11.04 did have the intel GMA system hang issue, but it was rare, and could be reduced even further by setting i915.semaphores=1 on the kernel command line. 11.10 does not have an issue, with or without that setting though.

UK DMCA Effectively Bans Public Wi-Fi->

Submitted by hol
hol writes "One of the effects of the UK's DMCA equivalent being discussed is that effectively makes anyone providing free Wi-Fi an ISP, and so liable for pirated/otherwise illegal content being downloaded. Most coffee shops and the like can't afford the filtering software and systems to run them, which basically forces them to close the service."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Even less effective than street level cameras? (Score 4, Insightful) 390

by hol (#30907946) Attached to: UK Police Plan To Use Military-Style Spy Drones

Well, I guess this had to happen. Full fail for street level cameras for billions, so the only option left is to go full retard.

One cannot even argue that this is a responsible use of public funds:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/6082530/1000-CCTV-cameras-to-solve-just-one-crime-Met-Police-admits.html

Of course, tourist photos must be deleted though, you know, in the name of public safety. Where is the "shake my head in disbelief" animated icon again?

Comment: How can you be convicted of breaking a secret law? (Score 4, Interesting) 775

by hol (#29978788) Attached to: Secret Copyright Treaty Leaks. It's Bad. Very Bad.

This sounds tongue-in-cheek, but is really a serious question. On one hand, you have the notion of ignorance is no excuse although there are precedents now stating if you're famous, that's okay. There are precedents for secret treatises for national security, like the withdrawal of missiles from Turkey at the end of the Cuban Missile Crisis. But how would the mechanics of enforcement work?

Will the FBI kick in your door, shoot your dog, and haul you off for breaking a secret law?

Would they need a secret warrant?

If you ever got your day in court, would that court be secret too, to protect that law?

----

Now for Canada: A judge last year tossed out a RIAA style copyright suit because the defendant had made CDs. As everyone knows, Canada has a special tax on blank media to reimburse the copyright holders for piracy that may or may not happen. Kind of like paying a partial speeding ticket before you get into your car each day. Since this implies guilt, the defendant was deemed to have been punished already, and was so exempt from being convicted again.

How would the secret treaty work in Canada? Change the laws secretly?

Comment: Re:CARB, necessary evil (Score 1) 762

by hol (#29808915) Attached to: Car Glass Rules Could Impair Cell, GPS and Radio Signals In CA

The difference is whether your actions effect me? You are only free to do what you want so long as it does not negatively impact me.

As driving around in a Hummer for example *DOES* effect me, if the majority of people say you don't get to do that then you don't get to do that. It is no more nanny state than making murder a crime.

As for telling kids to pray in school, well whether they pray or not has no impact on me so the state does not get to say they must.

Get the picture?

Yes, I do get the picture. YOU want to ban things YOU find offensive, because YOU know better than anyone else, comrade.

Comment: Re:CARB, necessary evil (Score 1) 762

by hol (#29808197) Attached to: Car Glass Rules Could Impair Cell, GPS and Radio Signals In CA

Driving cars with poor gas mileage, or more to the topic, with glass that's not the most efficient for air conditioning, is a societal problem?

Yikes, that's a scary precedent.

What else do you think is a serious societal problem?

Where do you stop meddling in my choices as to the products I buy? I can't buy it because you don't "approve"? Can I buy a pickup truck, or do I need to "prove" I am a farmer?

Or will you make me take transit?

The market will stop making things that people don't buy. The only cars I recall seeing with glass like that were the old lincolns with the orange windows that the old people drove.

As far as your nanny state retort: There are people who believe that people ought to be left to their own choices in life, good or bad. And there are people who believe that their choices must be made for them, because they know better than the person they're deciding for. You have made an argument for the latter.

Problems start when people who are under your control rightfully abrogate their responsibilities to you too - you see, when you can't decide, you shouldn't hold them responsible. So they sit on their butts, whine about benefits, and make babies in the meantime. Because they whine about not being responsible, they're making everyone else feel bad, so you repress them - speak your mind, fewer, or no benefits. Your money runs low anyways with that much drag on the system, so all you can make are Trabant cars with cardboard hoods. Until the money runs out. Now what?

User Journal

Journal: Contract contract...

Journal by hol

Let's see. Contracting can be interesting - hacking around on Solaris 10 more than is probably good for me.

And my home PC's mainboard had a capacitor blow up after 3 1/2 years of service, and turn into a smoke machine. Never thought I'd see old gear die like that.

Comment: Re:Did the Gun Help? (Score 1) 458

by hol (#29798375) Attached to: SCO Terminates Darl McBride

So, did he ever get use that gun against the people who terminated him, I wonder?

I don't understand why he would, and he didn't, or else we'd have heard about it on CNN. It's probably facetious on your part, or you're ignorant about non-gangsta's with guns.

Law-abiding gun owners (and unless proven otherwise, he's still law-abiding) don't wave those things around, you know.

The public is an old woman. Let her maunder and mumble. -- Thomas Carlyle

Working...