Ouch. That really punched me in the feelings.

I keep reading your posts with this bizzare slant that there's a "native" population that isn't Israeli. I hate to break this to you (again, that is. As I've seen the replies too... but appearantly you've not been reading, or can't seem to grasp it, whatever) but whatever population you *may* be referring to had been conquered. Welcome to planet Earth, dipshit. We're now almost 70 years into the future of these events. EVERYONE LIVING THERE IS NATIVE. Your hate is barberic, uncivilized and unsophisticated. Sad.

Yeah, but it made more sense than English in that regard :P

Good luck for you... you're both!

Good one. Mod this guy up fellers.

And why is that, exactly?

Latin doesn't use punctuation.

You are nature... you are at war with your own body to sustain it while it keeps dying.

Is that like blaming google because patent trolls exist?

As an Israeli citizen, I'm aware of this. :)

I wound't be so quick, I don't believe we're in a complete agreement. About the only thing you'd get out of such statistics is that these elements (creed, race, pigments...) bare no significance on outcome. Hence a completely useless metric. But it does give a feeling like you're doing something if you're the one measuring these things.

That sig gave me diabeetus.

The point wasn't about what is "typical" it is about a legal blocker that exists in that one industry but not in the other. Care to comment on the actual blocker itself?

When taking into account things that bare no significance in studies of cognivitiy (creed, race, pigments...), it isn't sensitivity, it is logic. Pure and simple.

I think you meant "you'll", but I understand.