Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Unix

+ - FreeBSD 6.2 released

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE has now been made available. It is around 2 months behind schedule, but the ISO images of the CD's are now available at ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD."

Comment: Re:Informative, yes... (Score 1) 157

by hayds (#10549809) Attached to: DSPAM v3.2 Released

Just clearing something up. The message that he was receiving wasnt a reply from a virus scanner, it was a bounce. I totally agree with you that virus scanners that reply to addresses that are 'sending' viruses are a total waste of time as the sender addresses are always forged.

In this case though, the receiving server is not replying to tell him that he has sent a virus, its telling him that hes sent an email to a nonexistant user. Obviously a message like this can be very useful if you have mistyped an address or something.

As to whether these messages are "junk" or "spam" I guess depends on your definitions and what you expect your spam filter to do. I have no argument that masses of postmaster messages like that are a total pain in the ass, but they are not spam as in the definition of "unsolicited bulk advertising email". Some of them are an annoying byproduct of viruses, but others are there to warn you if there is a problem with delivering your mail and so I think its worthwhile pointing out that there are disadvantages to just blindly filtering them out.

C for yourself.

Working...