Where are you getting this 1000 year 10m higher sea level thing from anyway? Given that we have evidence of Roman and post-Roman settlements a few metres above current sea levels, I suspect this is complete bullshit.
Not that it is important now, we've build our cities to cope with high tides that we were getting in the very recent past. We have an accelerating sea level rise: 8cm in 20 years is in the past, the next 8 cm will occur in 15 years, the 8cm beyond that in 10 years.
Regardless, a 1 metre level in sea directly affects high tide levels too, so it's massive volumes of water overspilling sea defenses and backfilling very large areas of low level land beyond. Some cities build around tidal rivers will be fine - barriers will be built. Cities on the coast will find $$$ flooding events increasing from once a century to once a decade. And then once or twice a year at seasonal high tides.
And sea walls won't save any city built on porous materials. Miami, for example...
Hah, as if you could get a signal from a Virgin Media router more than 10 metres away!
This is what happens when you don't own the router yourself. Virgin will use it, and their connection that they also rent to you, to make money on other services.
Hopefully 0.5Mbps will not saturate the shared cable connection! Performance is bad enough already, and I'm meant to get 60mbps.
Yeah, that's what is truly unbelievable!
Space X will get there. Probably a lot later than the recent article suggested of course. And I don't know why they want to do the single-shot to Mars rather than the two-shot LEO, then Mars method. Oh well...
NASA will only get there if the Chinese start a project to get there first, and that would require their economy to turn around
The blog isn't a scientific article about living on mars. It's an article about how one proven achiever of a man is putting everything in place to make getting to Mars achievable in his lifetime. The examples are simplistic, because the reality would be tedious.
Compared to the joke that is the Mars One project, it seems achievable!
Clearly the author needed scientific review of his work, and then he could have gone through and fixed up the amounts to make things work (e.g., he would have 80 litres of liquid O2 up front instead of 50).
Hopefully the movie has fixed things - probably by removing the attempts at being scientific to make it palatable to the audience.
So maybe we can assume the solar panels aren't 10% efficient, but 40%. And that there is another power source besides solar (the article alludes to this). And maybe that growing food in regolith would be a primary experiment for martian travellers, so they would have suitable lighting with them. Doesn't fix the book, but it might fix the accuracy of the movie.
But generally I watch movies for entertainment, and I can suspend disbelief to that end. Otherwise I would not have made it to the end of 2012.
The food was cooked to order on behalf of the customer. There is an implied transfer of ownership and all rights from the restaurant (or chef) to the customer, hence the customer is allowed to destroy the chef's work without being sued.
If the chef wanted to retain artistic copyright of his work, then he should have got the customer to sign a contract.
C'mon, gullwing door! What else do you want in a small habitat that fails to be a caravan, a useful shape, or have efficient use of space?
Those are an effect of being in poverty.
Sure, a few rich idiots fall down into poverty each year, but we're talking about multi-generational poverty here.
No "life choice" at all here.
Your parents are poor. You are born. You miss out of toys, learning, experience all through your young life. A parent becomes ill but without insurance or money you have to quit school to look after them. Or your dad is an alcoholic and you have to leave home... basically, you're fucked already and you aren't even an adult yet.
You clearly had an opportunity to pull yourself out of that situation.
However studies have shown that in the main, it doesn't matter how motivated you are to get out of being poor - everything is stacked against you, and in a competitive employment environment you will always be overlooked in favour of someone who had opportunities that you didn't because they simply got further, have experience more, and done more, and are better educated. These differences have been traced back to being a toddler - toddlers in poor families who become better off still do worse than toddlers in well off families. Basically, if you're poor, you're fucked in a society that doesn't equalise and provide opportunity.
And it has got a lot worse since the 50s and 60s, when at least some pretence was made that the "american dream" was doable.
That depends on whether you are using it as storage, or a main memory.
As a main memory, that is nowhere near enough writes.
And yes, this is being suggested as a solution for main memories in certain applications. However, these applications will not change state as often - in-memory caches, databases, etc.
That list has some very specific entries on it.
What would be useful to know is what the end-consumer could expect to see in terms of savings from this tariff removal (should it be passed on at retail).
Yes, ALL tax breaks for the oil and gas industry should be abolished.
Why not? This extends the spreadsheet as a tool to include complex real time processing, and allow people who are spreadsheet savvy but otherwise not programming savvy, to calculate and visualise large complex datasets in however way they want to.
Indeed, given the complexity of parallel programming, for many problems that could be expressed on a spreadsheet, but were before not viable because of the speed, these can now use the spreadsheet, and get results better than what many programmers could achieve without using OpenCL/CUDA/OpenMP themselves.
“People who made early implementations of Perl 6 came back to me, cap in hand, and said “We really need a language designer.””
“I was almost explicitly told: “Stay out of the implementation! We saw what you did made out of Perl 5”
“With Perl 6, we found some ways to make the computer more sure about what the user is talking about.”
The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable. -- John Kenneth Galbraith