Sorry but I'm throwing a flag, bullshit on the field. you are using the classic "It is ONLY bad if (X) does it" which time and time again has been shown to be bullshit, either you are for something or you are not PERIOD.
After all by your logic as long as a single dial up ISP is willing to run a certain kind of speech it would be 100% okay if all the other ISPs blocked it because "There is no problem with a single newspaper refusing to carry something, as long as there are other newspapers that are willing to run it " so as long as ONE is willing to run it then that is okay.
The fact that you managed to get marked insightful just shows how few really think here because you know what that attitude gets you? Free speech zones. after all you can still speak freely so what is the problem? The problem is you make damned sure they can ONLY speak far enough away they will be marginalized and ignored, that is what. You are also ignoring the second half of my post, which is what you get when you start doing this and that is HuffPo and Drudge circlejerks where all that is left is people that agree with you no matter what.
You go to a site that doesn't reinforce this groupthink mentality? Its like night and day. here if I point out that a certain driver model doesn't work and isn't used by anybody else I will instantly get swarmed by the groupthink who will bury me STRICTLY because of Dogma, when you ask them to name even one actual thought out reason why they support X model over Y model? they can't do it, its "X says it is bad so it must be bad". whereas i have gone to other sites with a similar article and posted the same position, what did I get? A nearly 2 page discussion on the various merits and weaknesses of different model designs!
As we have seen time after time troll ends up being "I don't like your position so it MUST be bad" which is a cancer that just kills discussion, only groupthink is allowed. So even if you support his right to censor (again hypocrite that it is, because it is "X is bad if THEY do it but not if WE do it") that doesn't change the fact it has the intended consequence of "weeding out" all that don't think like the mod until the whole place becomes nothing but fawning sycophants. Again all you have to do is look right here, certain positions are simply not allowed because they go against the groupthink and no matter how well reasoned or researched your position is it WILL be crushed by the yes men.
So I would say a hypocrite is a hypocrite, it would be like saying he is for government aid to the poor while hiding all his money in the caymans, he talks the talk but he sure as fuck don't walk the walk and he rightly deserves to be called out for that.